نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
Noticing that the traditional view of responsibility for compensation in traffic accidents has not met the current needs of society, the legislator in 2014 by approving the Islamic Penal Code and placing the rule of citation as the basis of legislation, made provisions in line with the implementation of justice and in accordance with the global legal systems. One of the rules ratified in this law is article 526 in which the decree of liability distribution in terms of impact degree has been issued by passing the general opinion of jurists and article 332 of civil law in cases of equality of accessory and perpetrator. On the other hand, in Article 528 of the same law, in the discussion of accidents, it is decided to divide the responsibility equally, ignoring the degree of impact. It seems that there is a partial relationship between these two and the meeting point is the assumption of attendance of the accessory and perpetrator of the accident at the same time, which is included in both articles. The question that comes to mind is which of these two is dominant? This study with a descriptive-analytical library method concluded that if there is equality of accessory and perpetrator in accidents, article 526 is dominant and liability distribution should be issued between them in terms of impact degree. But the application of article 528 cannot be ignored in other ratios according to the juridical tradition of the issue.
کلیدواژهها English
