فهرست منابع
الف. فارسی
1. جنیدی، لعیا (1376)، قانون حاکم بر داوریهای تجاری بینالمللی، چاپ نخست، تهران: دادگستر.
2. جوهر، سعید (1401)، داوری تجاری بینالمللی، تهران: جاودانه.
3. خدابخشی، عبداله (1403)، حقوق داوری و دعاوی مربوط به آن در رویه قضایی، چاپ پانزدهم، تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار.
4. شیروی، عبدالحسین (1398)، داوری تجاری بینالمللی، تهران: سمت.
5. صفایی، حسین (1372)، «تعیین قانون حاکم بر ماهیت دعوی در داوریهای بینالمللی»، نشریه دانشکده حقوق دانشگاه تهران، شماره پیاپی 1142.
6. علیدادی دهکهنه، علی و جوهری، ابوذر (1403)، حقوق داوری کاربردی همراه با رویه قضایی ایران و بررسی مقررات آنسیترال، چاپ هفتم، تهران: مرکز مطبوعات و انتشارات قوه قضاییه.
7. کاتوزیان، ناصر (1387)، قانون مدنی در نظم حقوقی کنونی، تهران: میزان.
8. کاتوزیان، ناصر (1393)، دوره حقوق مدنی، قواعد عمومی قراردادها، جلد نخست، چاپ دوازدهم، تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار.
9. الماسی، نجادعلی (1400)، تعارض قوانین، تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
10. مافی، همایون (1397)، شرحی بر قانون داوری تجاری بینالمللی، چاپ دوم، تهران: جنگل.
ب. انگلیسی و فرانسوی
1. Abdulhay, S (2004). Corruption in International Trade and Commercial Arbitration, London: United Kingdom: Kluwer Law International.
2. Annalisa De Grandi, Laurent Posocco, Patrick Posocco, Droit commercial, Ellipses, 2022.
3. Ansari, J.A (2014). Party Autonomy in Arbitration: A Critical Analysis (ISSN: 1553-9865). <http://www.sciencepub.net/researcher> accessed 12 August, 2015.
4. Blackaby, N., Partasides, C., Redfern, A., & Hunter, M (2015). Redfern and Hunter on international arbitration (Sixth edition.). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
5. Blessing, M (1997). Choice of Substantive Law in International Arbitration, 14 (2). J. INT’L ARB. 39.
6. Born, G (2020). International commercial arbitration (Third edition.). Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
7. Chenoy, C (2018). Theory of Delocalization in International Commercial Arbitration, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3521053 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3521053.
8. Conrad, N, Münch, P, Black-Branch, J, (2013). International commercial arbitration: standard clauses and forms: commentary, Basel, Switzerland: Helbing Lichtenhahn.
9. De Boisséson M., Madesclair J., Fouchard C., Le droit français de l'arbitrage, 2023, Lextenso.
10. Ferrari F, Silberman, L (2010). Getting to the Law Applicable to the Merits in International Arbitration and the Consequences of Getting it Wrong, 7 (26). REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ARBITRAGEM 73.
11. Fouchard, P., Gaillard, E., Goldman, B., & Savage, J (1999). Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman on international commercial arbitration. The Hague ; Boston: Kluwer Law International.
12. Greenberg, A. J., Yanowitz, J. L., & Schedl, P (2004). The Drosophila GAGA Factor is required for Dosage Compensation in Males and for the Formation of the Male-Specific-Lethal Complex Chromatin Entry Site at 12DE. Genetics, 166 (1).
13. Jones, D (2014). Choosing the Law or Rules of Law to Govern the Substantive Rights of the Parties, Singapore Academy of Law Journal 26.
14. Karton, J (2009). Party Autonomy and Choice of Law: Is International Arbitration Leading the Way or Marching to the Beat of its Own Drummer? (November 19, 2009). University of New Brunswick Law Journal, 2010, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1509764 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1509764.
15. Lando, O (1998). Dicey & Morris, the Conflict of Laws: A Review. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 47 (2).
16. Lew, Mistelis, L. A., & Kröll, S (2003). Comparative International Commercial Arbitration / by Julian D.M. Lew, Loukas A. Mistelis, Stefan M. Kröll. Kluwer Law International.
17. Louis Vogel, Du droit commercial au droit économique, 2021, LGDJ, 21e edition.
18. Ma, W, (2015). The Law Applicable to the Substance of Arbitral Disputes: Arbitrators’ Choice in Absence of Parties’ Choice (November 30, 2015). Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, Vol. 8, No. 2.
19. Mistelis, B, George A. Bermann and Loukas A (2011). Mandatory Rules in International Arbitration, New York: Juris Publishing.
20. Morris & Collins, (2010). The Conflict of Laws, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 14th Ed, Vol. 2.
21. Mukhopadhyay, R (2013). The Possible Conflict of Law Rules Employed in International Commercial Arbitration to Discern the Governing Law: An Analysis, Indian Journal of Arbitration Law 2, 110
22. Park, William W (2008). Non-Signatories and International Contracts: An Arbitrator's Dilemma (January 1, 2008). Two Dispute Res. Int'l 84.
23. Petche, MA, (2010). International Commercial Arbitration and the Transformation of Conflict of Laws Theory, Michigan State Journal of international law.
24. Philip Ray, Ph, (2016). Private Dispute Resolution in International Business: Negotiation, Mediation, Arbitration, (3rd revised ed.), by Klaus Peter Berger, Arbitration International, Volume 32.
25. Schmalz, G, (2015). Arbitration in Germany – The Model Law in Practice, 2nd edition, § 1051 ZPO.
26. Schwartz EA, Derains, Y (2005). Guide to the ICC Rules of Arbitration, Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International BV, 2nd edition.
27. Shackelford, E (2006), Party Autonomy and Regional Harmonization of Rules in International Commercial Arbitration, vol. 67 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 897.
28. Waincymer, J. M (2012). Procedure and Evidence in International Arbitration (First Ed.). Kluwer Law International.
29. Wilson Odoe, L O, “Party Autonomy and Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements and Award as the Basis of Arbitration” (January 2014). Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester 48; Michael Pryles, “Limits of Party Autonomy in Arbitral Procedure”.
30. Working Group Report II, Rep. of the Working Grp. on Int’l Contract Practices on the Work of Its 6th Sess., Aug. 29–Sept. 9, 1983, U.N. Doc. A/CN.9/245 (Sept. 22, 1983).
31. Wortmann, B (1998). Choice of Law by Arbitrators: The Applicable Conflict of Laws System, Arbitration International, Volume 14, Issue 2.
