نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
1 قاضی دادگستری، دکتری حقوق کیفری و جرمشناسی، دانشکدۀ حقوق، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
2 کارشناس ارشد حقوق بشر، دپارتمان حقوق، دانشگاه مفید، قم، ایران
عنوان مقاله [English]
In recent years, the debate of publishing and reporting the punishments of economic offenders in the media has been challenged. This matter enhanced its importance about judges and prosecutors for the necessity of dealing with corruption at the level of sovereignty and, at the same time, the importance of maintaining the place of judgment. From their point of view, the release of images and names of the convicts was also sensitive. From criminologists’ perspective, each punishment contains advantages and disadvantages. Meanwhile neglecting the purposes of scandal's pathology and Tash'hir, in Iranian penal system that is imposed on corrupt judges, leads to overcoming incommodities instead of gaining benefits. This article seeks to review the country's laws regarding to Tash'hir and recent approaches of the judicial authorities and to conclude that according to the current rules and doctrines, the public disclosure of corrupt judges may be more offensive than promoting.