نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشیار دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

نظام عدالت کیفری، در دستور‌العمل جدید خود، از منطقی تبعیت می‌کند که از طریق آن بتواند جایگاه از دست‌رفته‌ی خود را بازیابد. این منطق جدید، با عنوان کیفرشناسی نوین یا عدالت محاسبه‌گر، خانه‌تکانی گسترده‌ای را در این نظام ایجاد کرده است؛ به‌گونه‌ای‌که همه چیز در آن، رنگ و لعابی مدیریتی به خود گرفته است؛ از این پس، جرم و مجرم در چارچوب مفهوم خطر قابل درک است؛ تکنیک‌های نظام عدالت کیفری نیز هم‌گام با این تغییر رویه پیش رفته و در مواردی، مدل‌های جدیدی از آن ایجاد شده ‌است. در نوشتار حاضر، تحولات نوین صورت گرفته در این خصوص بررسی می‌شود

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Look at the Conceptual and Functional Developments in new Penology

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyyed Mohammad Hosseini
  • Zahra Saedi
  • Azadeh Sadeghi

چکیده [English]

Criminal justice system in its new guidelines follows a logic that could through it regain its lost position once again. This new logic, with the name of new penology or actuarial justice, has created extensive evolution in this system, so that everything in it has gotten a managing frame. Hereafter, crime and criminal have became understandable in the concept of risk; techniques of criminal justice systems have gone along with this changing in policy and even in some cases, new models of it have been made. Whatever has been explored in the present paper are the new developments that have occurred in this regard.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • New Penology
  • Crime
  • Criminal
  • Technique
  • Management
  • Surveillance
پاک‌نهاد، امیر، سیاست جنایی ریسک‌مدار، تهران: میزان، چاپ نخست، 1388.
تونری، مایکل، « کیفرهای اجتماع‌محور در ایالات متحده‌ی آمریکا»، برگردان: مینا صدیق‌فر، مجله‌ی حقوقی دادگستری، شماره‌ی 64، پاییز 1387.
دورکیم، امیل، درباره‌ی تقسیم کار اجتماعی، برگردان: باقر پرهام، کتاب‌سرای بابل، چاپ نخست، 1369.
کاشفی اسماعیل‌زاده، حسن، «جنبش‌های بازگشت به کیفر در سیاست جنایی کشورهای غربی: علل و جلوه‌ها»، مجله‌ی تخصصی الهیات و حقوق، مشهد، دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی، شماره‌ها‌ی 15 و 16، بهار و تابستان 1384.
طالبی، ابوالقاسم، « زندان‌ها در ایالات متحده»، ماهنامه‌ی اصلاح و تربیت، سال هفتم، شماره‌ی 72، فروردین 1387.
Ambrosio, Joseph. p, “The Drug Courier Profile and Airport Stops: Reasonable Intrusions or Suspicion Less Seizures”, Nova Law Review, Vol. 12, 1987.
Bayens, Gerald. J; Manske, Michael.W; Smykla, John. O, “The Impact of the New Penology on ISP”, Criminal Justice Review, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1998.
Blomberg, Thomas; Yeisley, Mark; Lucken, Karol,” American Penology: Words, Deeds, and Consequences”, Crime, Law & Social Change,1998.
Blumstein, Alfered; Cohen, Jacqueline; Roth, Jeffery A.; Visher, Christy A., “Criminal Careers and Career Criminals”, National Academy Press, Vol. 1, 1986.
Erwin, Billie S., “Turning Up the Heat on Probationers in Georgia”, Federal Probation 50(2), 1986.
Feeley, Malcolm; Simon, Jonathan, “The Form and Limits of the New Penology”, Punishment and Social Control: Essays in Honor of Sheldon L. Messinger Author(s) Blomberg, Thomas G., Cohen, Stanley, Publication New York Volume Social Institutions and Social Change ,1995.
Feeley, Malcolm; Simon, Jonathan, “Actuarial Justice: The Emerging New Criminal Law”, In Nelken D. (dir), The Future of Criminology, Sage, London: 1994.
Feeley, Malcolm; Simon, Jonathan,”The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and its Implications”, Criminology, Vol. 30, 1992.
Greenberg, David F., “The Incapacitation Effect of Imprisonment: Some Estimates”, Law and Society Review, 1975.
Gross, Ariela ,”History, Race, and Prediction: Comments on Harcourt’s against Prediction”, Law and Social Inquiry,2008.
Harcourt, Bernard. E, “The Shaping of Chance: Actuarial Models and Criminal Profiling at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century”, The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 70, No. 1, 2003.
Jennings- Wesley G, M.S.J,  “Revisiting Prediction Models in Policing: Identifying High Risk Offenders”, American Journal of Criminal Justice, Vol.31, 2006.
Kadish, Mark. J, “The Drug Courier Profile: in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles; and Now in the Jury Box”, The American University Law Review, Vol. 46, 1997.
Mackenzie, Doris Layton; Shaw, James W., “Inmate Adjustment and Change during Shock Incarceration: The Impact of Correctional Boot Camp Programs”, Justice Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 1, Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, 1990.
Mackenzie, Doris L.; Souryal, Claire, “Multisite Evaluation of Shock Incarceration”, U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice, Research Report, 1994. 
Mackenzie, Doris L.,” Sentencing and Corrections in the 21st Century: Setting the Stage for the Future”, 2001.
Mathiesen, Thomas,”Selective Incapacitation Rrevisited”, Law and Human Behavior, Vol.22, Num4, 1998.
Natalini, Robert S., “Preventive  Detention and  Presuming under the Bail Rreform Aact of 198”, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 134:225, 1985-1986.
Petersilia, John; Turner, Susan, “Intensive Probation and Parole, Crime and Justice”, The University of Chicago Press, Vol.17, 1993.
Pizarro, Jesenla; Stenius, Vanja. M. K,” Supermax Prisons: Their Rise, Current Practices and Effort on Inmates”,  The Prison Journal, Vol. 84, No. 2, 2004.
Pizarro, Jesenla M.; Stenius, M. K.; Travis, Vanja C. Pratt,” Supermax Prisons Myths, Realities, and the Politics of Punishment in American Society”, Criminal Justice Policy Review, Vol. 17,  N. 1, 2006.
Preventive Detention, www.West’s Encyclopedia of America Common Law.com
Rose, William, “Crimes of Color: Risk, Profiling, and the Contemporary Racialization of Social Control”, New Research in American Political Development, International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, Vol. 16, No. 2,  2002.
Sapir, Yoav, Against Prevention? A Response to Harcourt’s Against Prediction on Actuarial and Clinical Predictions and the Faults of Incapacitation, Law and Social Inquiry, Vol. 33, 2008.rL
Shichor, David, “Penal Policies at the Threshold of the Twenty-First Century”, Criminal Justice Review, Vol. 25, No.1, 2000.
Slingeneyer, Thibaut, “The New Penology: A Grid for Analyzing the Ttransformations of Penal Discourses, Techniques and Objectives”, Vol. IV, 2007.
Stengel, Casey, “Management and Treatment”, Mega Links in Criminal Justice
Sun- key, “Offender Classification and Assessment in  Book: Correctional Counseling: A Cognitive Growth Perspective”, Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2007.
The Bail Reform Act of 1984, Federal Judicial Center,1993, Second Edition
Tony, Michael; Lynch, Source- Mary, ”Intermediate Sanctions”, Crime and Justice, Vol. 20, Published by: The University of Chicago Press, 1996.
Williams, Vergil L., “Dictionary of American Penology Green Wood Publication Group”,1996.
Wilson, David B.; Mackenzie, Doris. Layton, in "preventing Crime: What Works for Children, Offenders, Victims and Places", Chapter 5, Boot camps, 2006