فهرست منابع
الف. فارسی
* بحری، ساره (1403)، «بررسی نقش ناامنی اجتماعی و شکاف طبقاتی بر بزهدیدگی زنان»، فصلنامه مطالعات حقوق، دوره جدید، شماره 40.
* پورمحمدی، رضا و یوسفی، محمدمهدی (1401)، «تأثیر جنسیت بر تفسیر حقوقی»، مجله حقوقی دادگستری، دوره 86، شماره 119.
* عارفی، مرتضی و ربیعی، زهرا (1402)، «ارزیابی تأثیر جنسیت به عنوان متغیر فراقانونی بر آراء کیفری حوزه مواد مخدر (مطالعه موردی شهرستان کاشان)»، مجله حقوقی دادگستری، دوره 87، شماره 124.
* کاظمپور، ثنا و فرجیها، محمد (1401)، «تبیین نظری تأثیر جنسیت بر تعیین مجازات مجرمان مواد مخدر؛ مطالعه تطبیقی ایران و آمریکا»، مجله حقوقی دادگستری، شماره 117.
* کریمی، مهدی (1395)، «پژوهش میدانی تأثیر جنسیت زن در تعیین مجازات کیفری مطالعه موردی دادگاههای کیفری مشهد 1392»، پژوهشنامه زنان، سال هفتم، شماره 2.
* موسوی شیاده، سیده زهرا و حبیبیتبار، جواد و لبیبی، محمد مهدی (1401)، «دشواریهای ارتقای شغلی قضات زن در تشکیلات قضایی ایران»، مطالعات فقهی حقوقی زن و خانواده، دوره 5، شماره 10.
* میرمجیدی، سپیده (1398)، «آزادی عمل قضایی در برساخت مصادیق رفتارهای مجرمانه: مطالعهی موردی پروندههای تجاوزجنسی»، پژوهشنامه زنان، سال دهم، شماره 3.
* میرمجیدی، سپیده و غلاملو، جمشید (1397)، «گستره مشروعیت آزادی عمل قضایی در پرتو اصل حاکمیت قانون (مطالعه موردی پروندههای رابطه نامشروع)»، مطالعات حقوق کیفری و جرمشناسی، دوره 48، شماره 2.
* ناظریان، حسین و فرجیها، محمد و حبیبزاده، محمدجعفر (1398)، «موانع دسترسی زنان متهم به جرائم جنسی به عدالت در پرتو نظریه مدونا – حور»، مطالعات حقوق کیفری و جرمشناسی، دوره 49، شماره 1.
* الهام، غلامحسین و نصیری، مصطفی (1395)، «آزادی عمل قضایی در صدور قرارهای تأمین کیفری»، مجلس و راهبرد، شماره 87.
ب. انگلیسی
٭ Abrams, D. S., Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2012). Do judges vary in their treatment of race? The Journal of Legal Studies, 41(2), 347–383.
٭ Arndt, M. (2022). Gender and Prosecutorial Decision Making: An Examination of Representative Bureaucracy Theory.
٭ ARUNA, J. O., & ADENEGAN, O. M. (2022). Gender Disparity in Nigerian Criminal Justice System: An Exploratory Study of Olukuta Correctional Centre, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria. Human Nature Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 109–117.
٭ Belenko, S., & Spohn, C. (2014). Drugs, crime, and justice.
٭ Bell, S. T., Kuriloff, P. J., & Lottes, I. (1994). Understanding attributions of blame in stranger rape and date rape situations: An examination of gender, race, identification, and students’ social perceptions of rape victims 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(19), 1719–1734.
٭ Bindler, A., & Hjalmarsson, R. (2020). The persistence of the criminal justice gender gap: Evidence from 200 years of judicial decisions. The Journal of Law and Economics, 63(2), 297–339.
٭ Bontrager, S., Barrick, K., & Stupi, E. (2013). Gender and sentencing: A meta-analysis of contemporary research. J. Gender Race & Just., 16, 349.
٭ Boyd, C. L., & Nelson, M. J. (2017). The effects of trial judge gender and public opinion on criminal sentencing decisions. Vand. L. Rev., 70, 1819.
٭ Carlsson, M., & Eriksson, S. (2019). In-group gender bias in hiring: Real-world evidence. Economics Letters, 185, 108686.
٭ Cornell, S., Digital, L. A., Law, C., Publications, F., & Johnson, S. L. (1998). Batson ethics for prosecutors and trial court judges. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 73(2), 475–508.
٭ Cox, J., MacNeil, E., & Lind, H. (2022). Gender, sex, and the prosecution of intimate partner violence. Intimate Partner Violence beyond the Gender Paradigm: A Criminal Justice Perspective, 85–109.
٭ Crespo, A. M. (2018). The hidden law of plea bargaining. Columbia Law Review, 118(5), 1303–1424.
٭ Dexter, H. R., Penrod, S., Linz, D., & Saunders, D. (1997). Attributing Responsibility to Female Victims After Exposure to Sexually Violent Films 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(24), 2149–2171.
٭ Didwania, S. H. (2018). Gender-based favoritism among criminal prosecutors. Columbia Law and Economics Workshop, New York, NY: Columbia University.
٭ Elkins, T. J., Phillips, J. S., & Konopaske, R. (2002). Gender-related biases in evaluations of sex discrimination allegations: Is perceived threat the key? Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 280.
٭ Everett, J. A. C., Faber, N. S., & Crockett, M. (2015). Preferences and beliefs in ingroup favoritism. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 126656.
٭ Fernando Rodriguez, S., Curry, T. R., & Lee, G. (2006). Gender differences in criminal sentencing: Do effects vary across violent, property, and drug offenses? Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 318–339.
٭ Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development.
٭ Grubb, A., & Harrower, J. (2008). Attribution of blame in cases of rape: An analysis of participant gender, type of rape and perceived similarity to the victim. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(5), 396–405.
٭ Guinier, L. (1997). Becoming gentlemen: Women, law school, and institutional change. Beacon Press.
٭ Harris, L. (2022). Achieving consistency in sentencing. Oxford University Press.
٭ Herz, M. (1996). “ Do Justice!”: Variations of a Thrice-Told Tale. Virginia Law Review, 111–161.
٭ Herzog, S. (2008). An attitudinal explanation of biases in the criminal justice system: An empirical testing of defensive attribution theory. Crime & Delinquency, 54(3), 457–481.
٭ Johnson, S. W., Songer, D. R., & Jilani, N. A. (2011). Judge gender, critical mass, and decision making in the appellate courts of Canada. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 32(3), 237–260.
٭ Kahn, A. (1977). Attribution of fault to a rape victim as a function of respectability of the victim: a failure to replicate or extend. Representative Research in Social Psychology.
٭ Kay, F., & Gorman, E. (2008). Women in the legal profession. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 4(1), 299–332.
٭ Khadka, C. (2025). Social Identity Theory and Group Behavior. November 2024. https://doi.org/10.3126/tutaj.v12i1.74063
٭ Kouabenan, D. R., Medina, M., Gilibert, D., & Bouzon, F. (2001). Hierarchical position, gender, accident severity, and causal attribution. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(3), 553–575.
٭ Krebs, D. (1975). Empathy and altruism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(6), 1134.
٭ Kritzer, H. M., & Uhlman, T. M. (1977). Sisterhood in the courtroom: Sex of judge and defendant as factors in criminal case disposition. Social Science Journal, 14(2), 77–88.
٭ Levy, I., & Ben-David, S. (2015). Mechanism of bystander-blaming: Defensive attribution, counterfactual thinking, and gender. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59(1), 96–113.
٭ Lim, C. S. H., Silveira, B. S., & Snyder, J. M. (2016). Do judges’ characteristics matter? ethnicity, gender, and partisanship in texas state trial courts. American Law and Economics Review, 18(2), 302–357.
٭ Locke, L. M., & Richman, C. L. (1999). Attitudes toward domestic violence: Race and gender issues. Sex Roles, 40(3), 227–247.
٭ Martin, P. Y., & Powell, R. M. (1994). Accounting for the “second assault”: Legal organizations’ framing of rape victims. Law & Social Inquiry, 19(4), 853–890.
٭ Mustard, D. B. (2001). Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from the US federal courts. The Journal of Law and Economics, 44(1), 285–314.
٭ Peresie, J. L. (2005). Female Judges Matter: Gender and Collegial Decisionmaking in the Federal Appellate Courts. Yale Law Journal, 1759–1790.
٭ Pinciotti, C. M., & Orcutt, H. K. (2020). It won’t happen to me: An examination of the effectiveness of defensive attribution in rape victim blaming. Violence against Women, 26(10), 1059–1079.
٭ Rehavi, M. M., & Starr, S. B. (2014). Racial disparity in federal criminal sentences. Journal of Political Economy, 122(6), 1320–1354.
٭ Rivera, L. M., Vu, H. A., & Backstrom, V. L. (2024). Self-esteem, ingroup favoritism, and outgroup evaluations: A meta-analysis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 27(7), 1569–1588.
٭ Rusch, H. (2014). The evolutionary interplay of intergroup conflict and altruism in humans: a review of parochial altruism theory and prospects for its extension. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1794), 20141539.
٭ Schmitt, F. E. (1998). What difference do women make? Prosecutorial decision-making in sexual assault cases. University of Delaware.
٭ Shermer, L. O., & Johnson, B. D. (2010). Criminal prosecutions: Examining prosecutorial discretion and charge reductions in US federal district courts. Justice Quarterly, 27(3), 394–430.
٭ Sisk, G. C., Heise, M., & Morriss, A. P. (1998). Charting the influences on the judicial mind: An empirical study of judicial reasoning. NYUL Rev., 73, 1377.
٭ Sloan, C. (2019). Racial bias by prosecutors: Evidence from random assignment. ICCJ 2019: International Conference on Criminal Justice June, 25–26.
٭ Starr, S. B. (2015). Estimating gender disparities in federal criminal cases. American Law and Economics Review, 17(1), 127–159.
٭ Steffensmeier, D., & Hebert, C. (1999). Women and men policymakers: Does the judge’s gender affect the sentencing of criminal defendants? Social Forces, 77(3), 1163–1196.
٭ Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36(4), 763–798.
٭ The Federal Prosecutor.pdf. (n.d.).
٭ Van der Bruggen, M., & Grubb, A. (2014). A review of the literature relating to rape victim blaming: An analysis of the impact of observer and victim characteristics on attribution of blame in rape cases. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(5), 523–531.
٭ Weare, S. (2013). “The mad”,“the bad”,“the victim”: Gendered constructions of women who kill within the criminal justice system. Laws, 2(3), 337–361.
٭ Wei, S., & Xiong, M. (2020). Judges’ gender and sentencing in China: An empirical inquiry. Feminist Criminology, 15(2), 217–250.
٭ Wermink, H., Johnson, B. D., Nieuwbeerta, P., & de Keijser, J. W. (2015). Expanding the scope of sentencing research: Determinants of juvenile and adult punishment in the Netherlands. European Journal of Criminology, 12(6), 739–768.
٭ Wilson, B. (1990). Will women judges really make a difference. Osgoode Hall LJ, 28, 507.
٭ Worrall, J., & Nugent-Borakove, M. E. (2014). The changing role of the American prosecutor. State University of New York Press.
٭ Yang, C. S. (2014). Have interjudge sentencing disparities increased in an advisory guidelines regime-evidence from Booker. NYUL Rev., 89, 1268.
