منابع
فارسی
§ کریمیان راوندی، مهدی (1386 )، مسئولیت مدنی روزنامه نگاران.چاپ نخست، تهران: دادگستر.
§ اسماعیلی، محسن (1388)، «حق پاسخ و تصحیح در صدا و سیما»،
= 6http://www.mohsenesmaeili.ir/NSite/FullStory/News/?Id
§ حیدری، علیمراد (1391)، «بررسی حق تصحیح رسانهای در حقوق ایران و اسناد بینالمللی»، پژوهشهای ارتباطی، شماره نوزدهم، دوره هفتادم.
§ ضیایی، سید ناصر و طباخی ممقانی، جواد (1391)، «حق پاسخگویی در رسانه از منظر حقوق بینالملل و حقوق ایران»، پژوهشهای حقوق تطبیقی، شماره چهارم. دوره پانزدهم.
انگلیسی
§ Ader, B. (2011). Le droit de réponse en ligne. LEGICOM, 46, 95-96. https://doi.org/10.3917/legi.046.0095.
§ Bollinger, L,. (1976). Freedom of the press and public access: toward a theory of partial regulation of the mass media. Michigan Law Review.75, 1.
§ Freitag, J., Gochee, M., Ransden, M., Nyhan, B., Roschke, K., & Gillmor, D. (2023). The Corrections Dilemma: Media Retractions Increase Belief Accuracy But Decrease Trust. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/xps.2023.4.
§ Johnson, B. G. (2019). Right of Reply. The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0094.
§ Koltay, A. (2007). The Right of Reply : A Comparative Approach. Iustum Aequum Salutare, 3(4), 203–213. http://real.mtak.hu/98864.
§ Koltay, A. (2013). The right of reply in a European comparative perspective. Acta Juridica Hungarica, 54(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1556/ajur.54.2013.1.6.
§ Koltay, A. (2022). The Protection of Freedom of Expression from Social Media. The Protection of Freedom of Expression from Social Media Platforms. Mercer Law Review, 73(2), 3–2022. Retrieved October 6, 2022, from https://digitalcommons.law.mercer.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2721&context=jour_mlr.
§ Lepage, A. (2006). Le droit de réponse sur l'internet et la loi de 1881 : entre filiation et émancipation. Legicom, 35, 91-97. https://doi.org/10.3917/legi.035.0091.
§ Lichtenberg, J,. (ed.) (1990). Democracy and the Mass Media: A Collection of Essays. Cambridge University Press.
§ Miami Herald Publ’g Co. v. Tornillo, 418 U.S. 241, 254–58 (1974).
§ Milojevic-Surculija, J. (2015). The right of reply: A tool for an individual to access the media. Godisnjak Fakulteta Politickih Nauka, 9 (13), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.5937/godfpn1513225m
§ Munk, R. (2019). Right Of Reply Of Public Officials. CER 11th Comparative European Research. London.
§ Red Lion Broad. Co. v. FCC, 395 U.S. 367 (1969).
§ Sunstein, C. (1994). A New Deal for Speech, Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal, 137.
§ Youm, K. (2008). The Right of Reply and Freedom of the Press: An International and Comparative Perspective. The George Washington Law Review. 76.
§ European Parliamentary Research Service. (2019). Freedom Of Expression, A Comparative Law Perspective: The United States. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank.
§ Lee, J. (2008). Right of Reply. The International Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecr097.
§ Peled, E. (2007). Constitutionalizing mandatory retraction in defemation. Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 30.
§ Glasser, C. J., Jr. (2009). International libel and privacy handbook: A global reference for journalists, publishers, webmasters, and lawyers (2nd ed.). Bloomberg Press.
§ Budica-Iacob, M. I. (2019). The Right To Reply From A Measure For Restoring The Right To Dignity To A Personality Right. Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, 8(2), 192–207. https://ideas.repec.org/a/sja/journl/v8y2019i2p192-207.html.
§ Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG] [Federal Constitutional Court] Jan. 14, 1998, 1 BvR 1861/93, (F.R.G.)
§ Weaver, R. L., & Fairgrieve, D. (2023). Damages, Injunctive Relief, and Other Remedies in Tort and Free Speech Cases. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
