فارسی

• الماسی، مسعود و احمد واعظی (1400)، «پوزیتویسم حقوقی در نظام قضایی ایران برایند تعاملیِ فرمالیسم حقوقی و نص گرایی قانونی»، مجله حقوقی دادگستری، دورۀ 86، شمارۀ 115.
• ‏‫پورمحمدی، رضا، محمدمهدی یوسفی و محمدعبدالصالح شاهنوش فروشانی (1400)، «تأثیر پیشینه اجتماعی قضات بر آرای قضائی»، مطالعات حقوق خصوصی، دورۀ 51، شمارۀ 3.
• ‏‫صالحی مازندرانی، محمد و رضا پورمحمدی (1399). نظریه اصول فهم عرفی: شناخت علل وقایع از منظر فقه و حقوق، ویراست2، قم: انتشارات دارالفکر.
• صانعی، پرویز (1381)، حقوق و اجتماع: رابطه حقوق با عوامل اجتماعی و روانی، تهران: طرح نو.
• فروغی نیک، رحیم (1387)، «تفسیر و استدلال حقوقی در حقوق رم»‏، مجله حقوقی دادگستری، دورۀ 72، شمارۀ 63-62.
• کاتوزیان، ناصر (1398)، فلسفه حقوق، جلد سوم، چاپ 1، تهران: گنج دانش.
• ‏‫محقق داماد، سیدمصطفی، رضا پورمحمدی و سیدمصطفی حسینی نسب (1400)، نظریه اصولی، چاپ ۱، جلد اول، قم: بوستان کتاب.

‏‫عربی

• ‏‫ ابن‌بابویه، محمد بن علی (1363)، من لا یحضره الفقیه، جلد چهارم، قم: جماعة المدرسین فی الحوزة العلمیة.
• بهبهانی، محمدباقر بن محمداکمل (1415ق)، الفوائد الحائریة، چاپ 1، قم: مجمع الفکر الإسلامی.
• میرزای قمی، ابوالقاسم بن محمدحسن (1430ق)، القوانین المحکمة فی الأصول، جلد اول، چاپ 1، قم: احیاء الکتب الاسلامیة.

انگلیسی

• Abdelkader, E. (2014). “To Judge or Not to Judge: A Comparative Analysis of Islamic Jurisprudential Approaches to Female Judges in the Muslim World (Indonesia, Egypt and Iran)”. Fordham International Law Journal, 37 (2), 309.
• Allen, D. W. (1991). “Voting Blocs and the Freshman Justice On State Supreme Courts”. Western Political Quarterly, 44 (3), 727–747.
• Allen, D. W., & Wall, D. E. (1987). “The Behavior of Women State Supreme Court Justices: Are They Tokens or Outsiders?”, The Justice System Journal, 12 (2), 232–245.
• ame, N. C. of the C. of C. in the U. S. of. (1977). The Liberating Word: A Guide to Nonsexist Interpretation of the Bible (L. M. Russell, Ed.). Westminster John Knox Pr.
• Ashenfelter, O., Eisenberg, T., & Schwab, S. (1995). Politics and the Judiciary: The Influence of Judicial Background on Case Outcomes. Cornell Law Faculty Publications.
• Barlas, A. (2002). “Believing Women” in Islam: Unreading Patriarchal Interpretations of the Qur’an (1st edition). University of Texas Press.
• Bauer, N. M. (2013). Rethinking stereotype reliance. Understanding the connection between female candidates and gender stereotypes. Politics and the Life Sciences: The Journal of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences, 32 (1), 22–42.
• Bauer, N. M. (2019). Gender Stereotyping in Political Decision Making. In N. M. Bauer, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press.
• Beaton, M. (2007). Interpreted Ideologies in Institutional Discourse: The Case of the European Parliament. The Translator, 13 (2), 271–296.
• Blume, J., & Eisenberg, T. (1999). Judicial Politics, Death Penalty Appeals, and Case Selection: An Empirical Study. Cornell Law Faculty Publications.
• Bornstein, B., & Miller, M. (2009). Does a Judge’s Religion Influence Decision Making? Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association.
• Bourreau-Dubois, C., Doriat-Duban, M., Jeandidier, B., & Ray, J.-C. (2020). Does gender diversity in panels of judges matter? Evidence from French child support cases. International Review of Law and Economics, 63, 105929.
• Boyd, C. L. (2016). Representation on the Courts? The Effects of Trial Judges’ Sex and Race. Political Research Quarterly, 69 (4), 788–799.
• Boyd, C., & Nelson, M. (2017). The Effects of Trial Judge Gender and Public Opinion on Criminal Sentencing Decisions. Vanderbilt Law Review, 70 (6), 1819.
• Britto, F. (2005). The Gender of God: Judeo-Christian Feminist Debates. In A. Jule (Ed.), Gender and the Language of Religion (pp. 25–40). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
• Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125 (3), 367–383.
• Chew, P. K., & Kelley, R. E. (2009). Myth of the Color-Blind Judge: An Empirical Analysis of Racial Harassment Cases. Washington University Law Review, 86 (5), 1117–1166.
• Colapietro, V. (1992). Charles S. Peirce: Logic and the Classification of the Sciences, Beverley Kent Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1987, selected bibliography, index, xii + 258 p. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue Canadienne de Philosophie, 31 (1), 139–143.
• Collins Jr., P. M., Manning, K. L., & Carp, R. A. (2010). Gender, Critical Mass, and Judicial Decision Making: Gender and Judicial Decision Making. Law & Policy, 32 (2), 260–281.
• Cook, B. (1979). Judicial Attitudes on Women’s Rights: Do Women Judges Make a Difference? Paper presented at the International Political Science Association Roundtable, University of Essex, Essex, England.
• Coontz, P. (2000). Gender and judicial decisions: Do female judges decide cases differently than male judges? Gender Issues, 18 (4), 59–73.
• Cox, A. B., & Miles, T. J. (2008). Judging the Voting Rights Act. Columbia Law Review, 108 (1), 1–54.
• Cross, F. B. (2007). Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals.
• Cross, J. F., Cross, J., & Daly, J. (1971). Sex, race, age, and beauty as factors in recognition of faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 10 (6), 393–396.
• Crowe, N. (1999). The effects of judges’ sex and race on judicial decision making on the U.S. courts of appeals, 1981-1996 [Thesis (Ph. D.)]. University of Chicago.
• d’Acremont, M., & Van der Linden, M. (2006). Gender differences in two decision-making tasks in a community sample of adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30 (4), 352–358.
• Dahl, R. A. (1957). Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker. Journal of Public Law, 6, 279.
• Daly, K. (1989). Neither Conflict Nor Labeling Nor Paternalism Will Suffice: Intersections of Race, Ethnicity, Gender, and Family in Criminal Court Decisions. Crime and Delinquency, 35, 136.
• Davis, S. (1986). President Carter’s Selection Reforms and Judicial Policymaking: A Voting Analysis of the United States Courts of Appeals. American Politics Quarterly, 14 (4), 328–344.
• Davis, S., Haire, S., & Songer, D. R. (1993). Voting Behavior and Gender on the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Judicature, 77, 129.
• Dawuni, J. J. (2016). To “Mother” or not to “Mother”: The Representative Roles of Women Judges in Ghana. Journal of African Law, 60 (3), 419–440.
• Derntl, B., Pintzinger, N., Kryspin-Exner, I., & SchÃpf, V. (2014). The impact of sex hormone concentrations on decision-making in females and males. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8.
• Diamond, I. (1977). Sex Roles in the State House. Yale University Press.
• Dworkin, R. (1978). Taking rights seriously. Harvard Univ. Press.
• Easterbrook, F. (1988). The Role of Original Intent in Statutory Construction. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 11, 59.
• Ruether, R. (1998). Religion and Sexism: Images of Woman in the Jewish and Christian Traditions (R. R. Ruether). Wipf and Stock.
• Epstein, L., & Knight, J. (2013). Reconsidering Judicial Preferences. Annual Review of Political Science, 16 (1), 11–31.
• Epstein, L., & Martin, A. D. (2004). Does Age (Really) Matter? A Response to Manning, Carroll, and Carp. Social Science Quarterly, 85 (1), 19–30.
• Erikson, R. S., & Tedin, K. L. (2019). American public opinion: Its origins, content, and impact (10th edition). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
• Farhang, S. (2004). Institutional Dynamics on the U.S. Court of Appeals: Minority Representation Under Panel Decision Making. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 20 (2), 299–330.
• Fix, M., & Johnson, G. (2017). Public Perceptions of Gender Bias in the Decisions of Female State Court Judges. Vanderbilt Law Review, 70 (6), 1845.
• Fox, R., & Van Sickel, R. (2000). Gender Dynamics and Judicial Behavior in Criminal Trial Courts: An Exploratory Study. The Justice System Journal, 21 (3), 261–280.
• Frederick J. Nitchie IV, Arcadia University. (2016). The Effect of Gender Stereotypes on Perceived Decision Making Abilities. The Compass, 1 (3).
• Freiburger, T. L. (2010). The effects of gender, family status, and race on sentencing decisions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28 (3), 378–395.
• Fuller, L. L. (1978). The morality of law (Rev. ed., 15. print). Yale Univ. Press.
• Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and Method.
• Gleason, S. A., Jones, J. J., & McBean, J. R. (2019). The Role of Gender Norms in Judicial Decision-Making at the U.S. Supreme Court: The Case of Male and Female Justices. American Politics Research, 47 (3), 494–529.
• Glynn, A. N., & Sen, M. (2015). Identifying Judicial Empathy: Does Having Daughters Cause Judges to Rule for Women’s Issues?: Identifying Judicial Empathy. American Journal of Political Science, 59 (1), 37–54.
• Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. (1978). Judging Face Similarity in Own and Other Races. The Journal of Psychology, 98 (2), 185–193.
• Gottschall, J. (1983). Carter’s Judicial Appointments: The Influence of Affirmative Action and Merit Selection on Voting on the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Judicature, 67, 165.
• Grissom, N. M., & Reyes, T. M. (2019). Let’s call the whole thing off: Evaluating gender and sex differences in executive function. Neuropsychopharmacology, 44 (1), 86–96.
• Gruhl, J., Spohn, C., & Welch, S. (1981). Women as Policymakers: The Case of Trial Judges. American Journal of Political Science, 25 (2), 308–322.
• Gryski, G. S., Main, E. C., & Dixon, W. J. (1986). Models of State High Court Decision Making in Sex Discrimination Cases. The Journal of Politics, 48 (1), 143–155.
• Günther, P. (2020). Groupthink Bias in International Adjudication. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 11 (1), 91–126.
• Hassen, R. (2011). English Translation of the Quran by Women: The Challenges of “Gender Balance” in and through Language.
• Heilbronner, S. R. (2017). Modeling risky decision-making in nonhuman animals: Shared core features. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 16, 23–29.
• Hershey, M. R. (1977). The Politics of Androgyny?: Sex Roles and Attitudes Toward Women in Politics. American Politics Quarterly, 5 (3), 261–287.
• Hewstone, M., Stroebe, W., & Jonas, K. (Eds.). (2012). An introduction to social psychology (Fifth edition). BPS Blackwell.
• Holman, M. R., Merolla, J. L., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2011). Sex, Stereotypes, and Security: A Study of the Effects of Terrorist Threat on Assessments of Female Leadership. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 32 (3), 173–192.
• Holmes, J. (1989). Bent Preisler, Linguistic sex roles in conversation: Social variation in the expression of tentativeness in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1986. Pp. xviii + 347. Language in Society, 18 (2), 293–299.
• Holmes, M. D., Hosch, H. M., Daudistel, H. C., Perez, D. A., & et al. (1993). Judges’ ethnicity and minority sentencing: Evidence concerning Hispanics. Social Science Quarterly, 74 (3), 496–506.
• Hunter, R. (2008). Can feminist judges make a difference? International Journal of the Legal Profession, 15 (1–2), 7–36.
• Idleman, S. (2005). The Concealment of Religious Values in Judicial Decisionmaking. 91 Virginia Law Review 515 (2005).
• Jamieson, K., & Hennessy, M. (2007). Public Understanding of and Support for the Courts: Survey Results. The Georgetown Law Journal, 95 (4), 899–902.
• Jeffries, S. (2002). Does gender really matter? Criminal court decision making in New Zealand. Undefined.
• Johnson, S. W., Stidham, R., Carp, R. A., & Manning, K. L. (2008). The Gender Influence on US District Court Decisions: Updating the Traditional Judge Attribute Model. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 29 (4), 497–526.
• Kanter, R. M. (2010). Men and women of the corporation (Nachdr.). Basic Books.
• Kassian, M. A. (2005). The Feminist Mistake: The Radical Impact of Feminism on Church and Culture. Crossway.
• Kenney, S. J. (2008). Thinking about gender and judging. International Journal of the Legal Profession, 15 (1–2), 87–110.
• Kritzer, H. M., & Uhlman, T. M. (1978). Sisterhood in the Courtroom: Sex of Judge and Defendant as Factors in Criminal Case Disposition: An Interdisciplinary Collection. Women’s Studies: An Interdisciplinary Collection, 75–86.