نوع مقاله: پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشکدۀ حقوق، دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران
2 قاضی دادگستری، مدرس دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه علامۀ طباطبائی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The rules of jurisdiction are regulated based on primary and secondary provisions. In primary rules of jurisdiction, the general framework for determining competence criteria is presented but the application of these regulations alone cannot meet the purpose pursued by the rules of jurisdiction. Therefore, by virtue of the application of these regulations, effective and appropriate competence will not be obtained; for this reason, secondary rules of jurisdiction play a critical role. Connectivity of claims is one of the secondary regulations of jurisdiction which will be affected by the relative jurisdiction and eventually lead to the development of the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. In the French civil procedure, the relative jurisdiction of development is different from that of Iran. The focus of this research is that “What are the effects of connectivity of claims on relative jurisdiction in civil procedure of both Iran and France?”, “What are the exclusions of the primary jurisdiction rules”?
کلیدواژهها [English]
)