نوع مقاله: پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه حقوق جزا و جرم شناسی دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی
2 قاضی دادگستری، دکتری حقوق کیفری و جرم‌شناسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی (واحد تهران مرکزی)
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The legislator emphasized on the IPC 1392 with the adoption of alternative community-based responses to children in conflict with the law was a special place.
this community punishment that in the 88, 89, 90 and 94 articles
according to the response of the circuit.
The community punishment order (CPO) was first introduced as the community service order
under the provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 1972 and it is now regulated within the Powers of the Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000.
The community punishment and rehabilitation order (CPRO) was introduced by the Criminal Justice Act 1991 and is now regulated within the Powers of the Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 and is, in essence, the marriage between the community punishment order (CPO) and the community rehabilitation order (CRO).
However, that legislative approach in the form of criminal policy reform social circuit judges to apply the most promising approaches based on care and correct answers, but this approach has several challenges faced judicial proceedings.effective implementation of these answers can be as effective.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)