Communication Law
Behnaz Ahmadvand; Baqer Ansari
Abstract
The right of reply aims to strike a balance between the freedom of the press and the rights of individuals to protect their personality, reputation, honor, and dignity. It is derived from the fundamental right to freedom of speech and media. This right serves as a legal mechanism to ensure accountability ...
Read More
The right of reply aims to strike a balance between the freedom of the press and the rights of individuals to protect their personality, reputation, honor, and dignity. It is derived from the fundamental right to freedom of speech and media. This right serves as a legal mechanism to ensure accountability of the press when they publish false or inaccurate information or engage in defamation. The primary goals of the right of reply include mitigating the negative consequences of false and misleading news and reporting, deterring irresponsible press behavior, and ensuring that the public receives accurate and complete information. Numerous countries differentiate between the right of reply and the right of correction. The former is invoked when the press disseminates information or opinions that are inaccurate or false, thereby infringing on an individual's inherent rights, such as reputation, privacy, and dignity. The Constitution is the primary source for recognizing or rejecting the right of reply in many prominent legal systems, while normal laws have been enacted in other jurisdictions to acknowledge this right and establish its parameters. Using a descriptive and analytical approach, the present article aims to identify the theoretical underpinnings, prerequisites, and constraints of implementing the right of reply in several crucial legal frameworks and laws in Iran.
Criminal Law
ali bahadori jahromi; MohammadReza Alipoor
Abstract
Social behavior as a subject of law is one of the most important issues that has been affected by the emergence of new technologies. In recent years, legal technologies (LegalTech) have been tried to increase public access to justice. These technologies affect three categories of judicial proceedings, ...
Read More
Social behavior as a subject of law is one of the most important issues that has been affected by the emergence of new technologies. In recent years, legal technologies (LegalTech) have been tried to increase public access to justice. These technologies affect three categories of judicial proceedings, private legal services, and government regulatory actions. Develope LegalTechs, like any other legal phenomenon, requires programing in the direction and in accordance with the principles of the legal system. Inattention to the relevance of legal systems governing and the LegalTechs that used in judicial proceedings, causes similar experience for LegalTechs, like imported technologies that not only did not facilitate and strengthen the quality of previous practices, but worse and irreparable problems. Have also been accompanied. In this article , we have tried to achieve the requirements of the legal system of the Islamic Republic of Iran on the judicial proceedings' LegalTechs by examining the principles of fair trial by analytical-descriptive method.
Private Law
Alireza mohmmadzadeh
Abstract
The Law on Translation and Reproduction of Books, Magazines, and Audio Works, passed in 1973, is one of the rare laws that has not yet been discussed in any paper. Perhaps one of the reasons for this inattention is the ambiguity and ambiguity that each of the articles of the law in turn raises. Undoubtedly, ...
Read More
The Law on Translation and Reproduction of Books, Magazines, and Audio Works, passed in 1973, is one of the rare laws that has not yet been discussed in any paper. Perhaps one of the reasons for this inattention is the ambiguity and ambiguity that each of the articles of the law in turn raises. Undoubtedly, the lack of a coherent intellectual flow of the law by the legislature, the lack of social sensitivity in protecting people with neighboring rights, especially artists-executors, the researchers' disregard for the rule of law, all contribute to this valley. The subject of this article is to ask these questions and answer them first, according to the national and international laws governing copyright and related rights. I hope that in future research, it will be promoted by well thought out and well-liked researchers of intellectual property rights and will be effective in protecting the neighboring rights.
Public Law
Baqer Ansari
Abstract
Individuals' access to the internet is one of the current debates at international and national levels from economic, cultural, social, political and legal perspectives. From a legal perspective, the main question is that: "is the access to the internet an individual right?" if so: "what is its content ...
Read More
Individuals' access to the internet is one of the current debates at international and national levels from economic, cultural, social, political and legal perspectives. From a legal perspective, the main question is that: "is the access to the internet an individual right?" if so: "what is its content and how can it be protected and realised?" This article, based on the desk research method, by studying international and regional instruments and interpretations, national legislative administrative and judicial practices and legal scholars' viewpoints, has concluded that the existence of this right is known as the dominant view but, its content still remains disputable. Nevertheless, the right to connect to the Internet, the principle of neutrality, the right to anonymity, the right to use encryption technology and the right to secure and transparent Internet can be recognized as the main elements of this right. Also, this right is mainly formal and structural in nature. In other words, it's about the principle of Internet access, not the content that is exchanged as a result of access.
