Human resources play the most crucial and sensitive role in establishing a dynamic and efficient administrative system. The implementation of a selection system aims to legitimize the holders of positions and to fulfill the missions of administrative institutions based on various indicators and criteria, carried out by multiple entities. In our country, the responsible bodies for this matter are the selection authorities, and judicial oversight over the decisions and actions of these authorities in executing the laws and regulations entrusted to them falls under the jurisdiction of the Administrative Justice Court as the judicial authority overseeing compliance with legal requirements.
Over the years following the establishment and operation of these bodies, the Court has exercised judicial review over various resolutions and decisions. The main question of this article is: what are the grounds for judicial review over the votes of selection authorities in the judicial practice of the Administrative Justice Court? In summary, it can be stated that the main focus of annulled rulings is the failure to observe formal aspects (such as the method of notification and the number of issuing members) and substantive aspects (including exceeding the limits of authorities and jurisdictions, lack of reasoned and documented decisions, the principle of presumption of innocence, and the personal nature of criminal responsibility).
The research method employed is descriptive-analytical, utilizing library research for the of collecting sources