نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 قاضی دادگستری، دانشجوی دکتری حقوق خصوصی، دانشکدۀ حقوق، الهیات و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی (واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران)، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار گروه حقوق خصوصی و اسلامی، دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
3 استادیار گروه حقوق جزا و جرم‌شناسی، دانشکدۀ حقوق، الهیات و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی (واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران)، تهران، ایران
4 دانشیار گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشکدۀ حقوق، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Ratification of the code of penal procedure in 1392 according to the law 1378 which considered the court of general jurisdiction had raised this question that what shall be the consequences by the separation of legal and criminal authorities? One of these effects would be the effectiveness of the legal authority from the criminal. Nevertheless to what extent are the conditions and the scope thereof legislator mentioned just the term effectiveness of the penal judgment over the judicial decision in Article 18 law 1392 while the term expressed clearly and we must study essential elements criminal review analyze the subject. In this article is that matter examining the range Issue Preclusion res Judicata Penal in Civil by mentioning the fundamentals the description and the condition of the principle mentioned above and by suggesting some judgment in the law of Iran and France through rationalizing the priority of the legal affair over penal. Finally, we have specified the exception of this subject related to the third party suffers in a loss of crime and deal with intention escape of debt. Method of research is based on style descriptive, analytical and functional (legal procedure). The principle result that in the paper was the rear is the act of proving existence the right third party suffer in a loss of law as mentioned earlier.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)