مک‌دونالدی کردن عدالت کیفری

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشیار دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی

چکیده

مک‌دونالدی کردن، فرایندی اداری است که در آن اصول رستوران‌های فست‌فود اعمال می‌شود. مک‌دونالدی کردن چندین نهاد اجتماعی، به دلیل برتری‌های آن بر سایر روش‌های نسبتاً قدیمی تجارت موفق بوده است. نهادهای اجتماعی مک‌دونالدی شده، تابع مقررات و منطق به مفهوم ماکس وبری آن شده‌اند؛ بنابراین، کارایی، قابلیت محاسبه، قابلیت پیش‌بینی و کنترل افراد، اغلب با فن‌آوری‌های ماشینی، در آن‌ها افزایش یافته است. ویژگی دیگر این فرآیند که ضعف اساسی نهادهای مک‌دونالدی شده نیز هست، غیرعقلانی بودن است که «ریتزر» از آن به «غیرعقلانی بودن منطقی» یاد می‌کند. هدف اصلی این نوشتار بررسی برخی موارد نامعقول عدالت کیفری مک‌دونالدی و ارائه‌ی چند پیشنهاد، درباره‌ی آن‌ها است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


1- Alschuler, A. W. 1979. Plea bargaining and its history, Law & Society Review, 13,211–245.

2- American Correctional Association, 2004. American Correctional Association 2004 directory: Adult and juvenile correctional departments institutions, agencies and probation and parole authorities. Lanham, MD: Author.

3- Bauer, L.; Owens, S. D. 2004, May. Justice expenditure and employment in the United States, 2001. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. US Department of Justice. Washington, DC: GPO.

4- Berry, S. M. 2003. Bad lawyering: How defense attorneys help convict the innocent. Northern Kentucky University Law Review, 30, 487–503.

5- Blomberg, T. G.;  Lucken, K. 2000. American penology: A history of control. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

6- Bohm, R. M. 2003. Deathquest II: An introduction to the theory and practice of capital punishment in the United States, (2nd ed. ). Cincinnati: Anderson.

7- Bonczar, T. P.; Glaze, L. E. 1999, August. Probation and parole in the United States,1998. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. US Department of Justice. Washington, DC: GPO.

8- Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 U. S. 357 (1978).

9- Brady v. United States, 397 U. S. 742 (1970).

10- Braithwaite, J. 1989. Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

11- Bright, S. B. 2003. The politics of capital punishment: The sacrifice of fairness for executions. In J. R. Acker, R. M. Bohm, & C. S. Lanier (Eds.), America’s experiment with capital punishment (2nd ed. , pp. 127–146). Durham, NC:Carolina Academic Press.

12- Burnett, C. 2002. Justice denied: Clemency appeals in death penalty cases. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

13- Camp, C. G.; Camp, G. M. 2002. The corrections yearbook 2001: Adult systems. Middletown, CT: Criminal Justice Institute.

14- Carter, R. 1996. Determinate sentences. In M. D. McShane & F. P. Williams III (Eds. ), Encyclopedia of American prisons. New York: Garland.

15- Clear, T.; Hewitt, J.; Regoli, R. 1978. Discretion and the determinate sentence: Its distribution, control, and effect on time served. Crime & Delinquency, 24, 428–445.

16- Currie, E. 1985. Confronting crime: An American challenge. New York: Pantheon. Death Penalty Information Center. (2005). Retrieved March 28, from www. deathpenaltyinfo. org

17- Ditton, P. M.; Wilson, D. J. 1999. Truth in sentencing in state prisons. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. US Department of Justice. Washington, DC: GPO.

18- Drane, J. 2001. The McDonaldization of the church. London: Darton, Longman & Todd.

19- Durose, M. R.; Langan, P. A. 2003. Felony sentences in state courts, 2000. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. US Department of Justice. Washington, DC: GPO.

20- Feeley, M. M.; Simon, J. 1992. The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology, 30, 449–474.

21- Feeley, M.; Simon, J. 1994. Actuarial justice: The emerging new criminal law. In D. Nelkin (Ed. ), The future of criminology (pp. 172–201). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

22- Firman, J. R. 2003. Deconstructing Compstat to clarify its intent. Criminology & Public Policy, 2, 457–460.

23- Forst, B. 2004. Errors of justice: Nature, sources and remedies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

24- Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U. S. 778 (1973).

25- Goodstein, L.; Hepburn, J. 1985. Determinate sentencing and imprisonment. Cincinnati: Anderson.

26- Gouldner, A. W. 1976. The dialectic of ideology and technology: The origins, grammar, and future of ideology. New York: Seabury Press.

27- Governor’s Commission on Capital Punishment. 2002. State of Illinois. Retrieved from ww. idoc. state. il. us/ccp/ccp/reports/commission_reports. html

28- Griset, P. L. 1991. Determinate sentencing: The promise and the reality of retributive justice. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

29- Griset, P. L. 1999. Criminal sentencing in Florida: Determinate sentencing’s hollow shell. Crime & Delinquency, 45, 316–333.

30- Gross, S. R. 1996. The risks of death: Why erroneous convictions are common in capital cases. Buffalo Law Review, 44, 469–500.

31- Gross, S. R. 1998. Lost lives: Miscarriages of justice in capital cases. Law and Contemporary Problems, 61, 125–152.

32- Harmon, T. R. 2001. Predictors of miscarriages of justice in capital cases. Justice Quarterly, 18, 949–968.

33- Harrison, P. M.; Beck, A. J. 2003, July. Prisoners in 2002.

34- Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. US Department of Justice. Washington, DC: GPO.

35- Hayes, D.; Wynyard, R. (Eds. ). 2002. The McDonaldization of higher education. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.

36- Henry, S.; Milovanovic, D. 1996. Constitutive criminology: Beyond postmodernism. London: Sage.

37- Horkheimer, M. 1996. Critique of instrumental reason. New York: Continuum.

38- Huff, C. R.; Rattner, A.; Sagarin, E. 1986. Guilty until proven innocent: Wrongful conviction and public policy. Crime & Delinquency, 32, 518–544.

39- International Centre for Prison Studies. 2003. World prison brief—Highest prison population rates. King’s College London. Retrieved from www. kcl. ac. uk/depsta/rel/icps/worldbrief/highest_ratesmanual. html

40- Jeannot, T. M. 1998. The McCommodification of society: Rationalization and critical heory. In M. Alfino, J. S. Caputo, & R. Wynyard (Eds. ), McDonaldization revisited: Critical essays on consumer culture (pp. 121–142). Westport, CT: Praeger.

41- Kellner, D. 1998. Foreword: McDonaldization and its discontents—Ritzer and his critics. In M. Alfino, J. S. Caputo, & R. Wynyard (Eds. ), McDonaldization revisited: Critical essays on consumer culture (pp. vii–xiv). Westport, CT: raeger.

42- Kemmesies, U. E. 2002. What do hamburgers and drug use have in common: Some unorthodox remarks on the McDonaldization and rationality of drug care. Journal of Drug Issues, 32, 689–707.

43- Kraska, P. B. 2004. Theorizing criminal justice: Eight essential orientations. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.

44- LaFree, G. 2002. Too much democracy or too much crime? Lessons from California’s three-strike law. Law & Social Inquiry, 27, 875–902.

45- Liebman, J. S.; Fagan, J.; West, V. 2000. A broken system: Error rates in capital cases, 1973–1995. Retrieved from www. justice. policy. net/jpreport. html

46- Mabrey, D. 2002. Crime mapping: Tracking the hotspots. Crime & Justice International, 18, 31–32.

47- Marcuse, H. 1966. One-dimensional man. Boston: Beacon Press.

48- Mello, M.; Perkins, P. J. 2003. Closing the circle: The illusion of lawyers for people litigating for their lives at the fin de siecle. In J. R. Acker, R. M. Bohm, & C. S. Lanier (Eds. ), America’s experiment with capital punishment (2nd d. , pp. 347–384). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.

49- Miles, S. 1998. McDonaldization and the global sports store: Constructing consumer meanings in a rationalized society. In M. Alfino, J. S. Caputo, & R. Wynyard (Eds. ), McDonaldization revisited: Critical essays on consumer culture (pp. 53–65). Westport, CT: Praeger.

50- Miller-Potter, K. S. 2002. Death by innocence: Wrongful convictions in capital cases. The Advocate: A Journal of Criminal Justice Education and Research, 24, 21–29.

51- Moore, M. H. 2003. Sizing up Compstat: An important administrative innovation in policing. Criminology & Public Policy, 2, 469–494.

52- More spent on prisons than universities in 1995. 1997, February 25. The Orlando Sentinel. P. A-6.

53- Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U. S. 471 (1972).

54- Packer, H. 1968. The limits of the criminal sanction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

55- Padgett, J. F. 1990. Plea bargaining and Prohibition in the federal courts, 1908–1934. Law & Society Review, 24, 413–450.

56- Palmer, T. 1994. A profile of correctional effectiveness and new directions for research. Albany: State University of New York Press.

57- Parker, M. 1998. Nostalgia and mass culture: McDonaldization and cultural elitism. In M. Alfino, J. S. Caputo, & R. Wynyard (Eds. ), McDonaldization revisited: Critical essays on consumer culture (pp. 1–18). Westport, CT: Praeger.

58- Parker, M.; Jary, D. 1995. The McUniversity: Organization, management and academic subjectivity. Organization, 2, 319–337.

59- Pepinsky, H. E.; Quinney, R. (Eds. ). (1991). Criminology as peacemaking. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

60- Prichard, P. 1987. The making of McPaper: The inside story of USA TODAY. Kansas City, MO: Andrews, McMeel & Parker.

61- Radelet, M. J.; Bedau, H. A.; Putnam, C. E. (1992). In spite of innocence: Erroneous convictions in capital cases. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

62- Reaves, B. 2001. Felony defendants in large urban counties, 1998. US Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. Washington, DC: GPO.

63- Reiser, S. J. 1978. Medicine and the reign of technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

64- Rinehart, J. A. 1998. It may be a polar night of icy darkness, but feminists are building a fire. In M. Alfino, J. S. Caputo, & R. Wynyard (Eds. ), McDonaldization revisited: Critical essays on consumer culture (pp. 19–38). Westport, CT: Praeger.

65- Ritzer, G. 2004. The McDonaldization of society (Rev. new century ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.

66- Ritzer, G.; Walczak, D. (1987). The changing nature of American medicine. Journal of American Culture, 9, 43–51.

67- Robinson, M. B. 2002. McDonaldization of America’s police, courts, and corrections. In G. Ritzer (Ed. ), McDonaldization: The reader (pp. 77–90). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.

68- Rojek, C. 1993. Ways of escape: Modern transformations in leisure and travel. London: Routledge.

69- Scheck, B.; Neufeld, P.; Dwyer, J. 2001. Actual innocence: When justice goes wrong and how to make it right. New York: Signet.

70- Schroyer, T. 1975. The critique of domination: The origins and development of critical theory. Boston: Beacon Press.

71- Sherman, L. W.; Gottfredson, D. ; MacKenzie, D.; Eck, J. ; Reuter, P. ; Bushway, S. (1997). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

72- Shichor, D. 1997. Three strikes as public policy: The convergence of the new penology and the McDonaldization of punishment. Crime & Delinquency, 43, 470–492.

73- Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics. 2002. Justice system direct and intergovernmental expenditures. Retrieved August 9, 2005, from http://www. albany. edu/sourcebook/tost_1. html#1_a.

74- Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics. 2002. Respondents indicating too little is spent on selected problems in this country (halting the rising crime rate). Retrieved August 9, 2005, from http://www. albany. edu/sourcebook/tost_2. html#2_u.

75- Spohn, C. , & Holleran, D. 2000. The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployed black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38, 281–306.

76- Stephens, G. 1987, January–February. Crime and punishment: Forces shaping the future. The Futurist, pp. 18–26.

77- Taylor, S.; Smith, S.; Lyon, P. 1998. McDonaldization and consumer choice in the future: An illusion or the next marketing revolution? In M. Alfino, J. S. Caputo, & R. Wynyard (Eds. ), McDonaldization revisited: Critical essays on consumer culture(pp. _105–119). Westport, CT: Praeger.

78- Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U. S. 1 1985.

79- Tonry, M. 1993. Sentencing commissions and their guidelines. Crime and Justice, 17, 137–195.

80- Tonry, M. 1996. Sentencing matters. New York: Oxford University Press.

81- Tonry, M.; Frase, R. S. (Eds. ). 2001. Sentencing & sanctions in western countries. New York: Oxford University Press.

82- US Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. 2002. Crime in the United States, 2001. Washington, DC: GPO.

83- Umbreit, M. S. 1999. Avoiding the marginalization and “McDonaldization” of victim–offender mediation: A case study in moving toward the mainstream. In G. Bazemore &L. Walgrave (Eds. ), Restorative juvenile justice: Repairing the harm of youth crime (pp. 213–234). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

84- wa Mwachofi, N. 1998. Missing the cultural basis of irrationality in the McDonaldization of society. In M. Alfino, J. S. Caputo, & R. Wynyard (Eds. ), McDonaldization revisited:Critical essays on consumer culture (pp. 143–158). Westport, CT: Praeger.

85- Weisburd, D.; Mastrofski, S. D.; McNally, A. M.; Greenspan, R.; Willis, J. J. 2003. Reforming to preserve: Compstat and strategic problem solving in American policing. Criminology & Public Policy, 2, 421–456.

86- Westervelt, S. D. ; Humphrey, J. A. (Eds. ). 2002. Wrongly convicted: Perspectives on failed justice. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

87- Willis, J. J.; Mastrofski, S. D.; Weisburd, D. 2004. Compstat and bureaucracy: A case study of challenges and opportunities for change. Justice Quarterly, 21, 463–496.

88- Wood, R. C. 1998. Old wine in new bottles: Critical limitations of the McDonaldization thesis-the case of hospitality services. In M. Alfino, J. S. Caputo, & R. Wynyard (Eds. ), McDonaldization revisited: Critical essays on consumer culture (pp. 85–103). Westport, CT: Praeger.

89- Wynyard, R. 1998. The bunless burger. In M. Alfino, J. S. Caputo, & R. Wynyard (Eds. ), McDonaldization revisited: Critical essays on consumer culture (pp. 159–174). Westport, CT: Praeger.