Criminal Law
Ruhollah Akrami; mojtaba yasini nasab
Abstract
One of the interlocutory orders is the criminal bail writ with various types specified in Article 217 of the Criminal Procedure Code. According to paragraphs “a” to “g” of this article, the investigating judge shall make an agreement with the accused, obliging him/her to attend ...
Read More
One of the interlocutory orders is the criminal bail writ with various types specified in Article 217 of the Criminal Procedure Code. According to paragraphs “a” to “g” of this article, the investigating judge shall make an agreement with the accused, obliging him/her to attend in or not to leave the designated place or to appear there periodically. Restricting an accused person who has not yet been proven guilty is against the Principle of Innocence, the Lack of Guardianship Principle (the principle that no person has any naturally vested power over any other person) and the Rule of Domination. Any violation of the mentioned principles requires a permit with special jurisprudential-legal titles, and their occurrence through orders for own recognizance (OR) release necessitates identifying their nature. To interpret the nature of these orders, theorists have put forward various doctrines such as indefinite contract, judicial action and non-contractual obligations. The existence of ambiguities in these doctrines led to the emergence of new possibilities such as declaration of damages, and compromise. The result of this desk-based descriptive-analytical study indicates that the orders for OR release are, by nature, the guardianship ordinance considering the hierarchy in the appointment of officials, and the penalty clause for them is ta'ziri (at the discretion of the judge), imposed by the Islamic ruler on the accused person who violates the ordinance.
Criminal Law
Mohsen Borhani; elaheh lotfalizadeh
Abstract
Due to the need to pay attention to dejudicialization and decarceration strategies, the repentance can be an effective tool to reduce the criminal population of prisoners. In 1392, the legislator for the first time made a general rule regarding the effectiveness of repentance in ta'zirat. Considering ...
Read More
Due to the need to pay attention to dejudicialization and decarceration strategies, the repentance can be an effective tool to reduce the criminal population of prisoners. In 1392, the legislator for the first time made a general rule regarding the effectiveness of repentance in ta'zirat. Considering the legal changes and the approval of Article 115 of the Islamic Penal Code, it is important to address the realm of repentance in time and the periods in which this institution can be used. In this article, with a descriptive and analytical method and with a critical approach to uniform judicial precedent vote No. 813 of supreme court, regarding the time of acceptance of repentance, this claim is proved that based on jurisprudential and legal principles, not only before proving the crime, in all ta'zir crimes, the repentance of the accused will result in the cancelation of the punishment, but also after proving the crime and even at the time of Execution of punishment, this institution can be used.
Islamic jurisprudence
zahra najjarzadegan sarabi; hadi sadeqi; mohammad hossien nazemi esheni
Abstract
The main issue of the court is the realization of the right, not the termination of the case. Therefore, the judge must use all kinds of arguments and ways to discover the truth. This requires judicial ijtihad, which is different from jurisprudential ijtihad. It depends on whether the judge can look ...
Read More
The main issue of the court is the realization of the right, not the termination of the case. Therefore, the judge must use all kinds of arguments and ways to discover the truth. This requires judicial ijtihad, which is different from jurisprudential ijtihad. It depends on whether the judge can look for evidence to find out the truth, and whether the search for evidence has a place in judicial ijtihad. In this article, we have examined this issue based on the paradigm of judicial ijtihad. The method is descriptive-analytical and in the field of jurisprudential and legal ideas and thougths. For this discussion, first the validity of the knowledge of the judge in jurisprudence and law has been discussed and then the position and role of studying evidence in the knowledge of the judge from the perspective of jurisprudence and law has been examined. The result is the permission and obligation of the judge to study the evidence based on the paradigm of judicial ijtihad, which requires a change in the way judges are educated and the use of new methods of experimental sciences in detecting crime and achieving reality.
Criminal Law
MohammadHadi Tavakkolpoor; Mohammad Amin Maleki
Abstract
Well-known Imami jurists believe that insanity after crime committing does not prevent the execution of punishment. Although this opinion has been questioned by some jurists and also the Iranian legislature has provided conditions for the possibility of executing this punishment in its criminal law, ...
Read More
Well-known Imami jurists believe that insanity after crime committing does not prevent the execution of punishment. Although this opinion has been questioned by some jurists and also the Iranian legislature has provided conditions for the possibility of executing this punishment in its criminal law, but it seems that by carefully documenting the validity of this issue, more restrictions can be placed on the execution of insane punishment. This research has reached the conclusion by descriptive and analytical method and by examining the authenticity and signification of the relevant narrations that the narration indicating the punishment of the insane does not apply in terms of the type of crime committed and the time of proof of the crime, i.e. the time of correctness or insanity and the method of proof, And its inclusion in the commission of any crime and also the presumption of proving the crime at the time of insanity and in any way is questionable. And it seems that what can be used from the evidence is the permission to perform the whipping punishment, which has been proven by the person's confession at the time of his health; This is more compatible with the defendant's defense rights and with the rule of Caution in bleeding.
Criminal Law
ali rezanezhad; Mohammad Mohseni dehkalany
Abstract
One of the issues that has been included in the Islamic Penal Code in 2013 with the opinion of the Guardian Council is the issue of Religious Ta'zir. Religious Ta'zir have many ambiguities and questions Because its nature and examples have not been explained by the legislator. One of the questions is: ...
Read More
One of the issues that has been included in the Islamic Penal Code in 2013 with the opinion of the Guardian Council is the issue of Religious Ta'zir. Religious Ta'zir have many ambiguities and questions Because its nature and examples have not been explained by the legislator. One of the questions is: Are the punishments prescribed in the Shari'a for the Religious Ta'zir a Shari'a decree or a governmental decree? or does the rule that says: in ta'zir, as the ruler deems it appropriate, include the Religious Ta'zir? This article wants to answer this question analytically and descriptively. Looking at the jurisprudential standards, it seems - against the opinion of the legislator- the rule that says: in ta'zir, as the ruler deems it appropriate, include the Religious Ta'zir. so the penalties imposed are government decrees. Because it is a general rule and the characteristics of a government decree are consistent with the rule and the words of the jurists and the words of the narrators are different.
Criminal Law
Ruhollah Akrami
Abstract
In regard to proving criminal cases, although each legal system has its own view over the validity of Confession, yet it has a special position in all legal system. Confession has an intrinsic value in different countries' regulations subject to the system of legal reasons, thus in some legal systems, ...
Read More
In regard to proving criminal cases, although each legal system has its own view over the validity of Confession, yet it has a special position in all legal system. Confession has an intrinsic value in different countries' regulations subject to the system of legal reasons, thus in some legal systems, the judge is obliged to issue a judgment based solely on the confession for the absolute validity given to it by the legislator. Whereas in countries affected by the system of moral reasons, the confession itself is not valid and its value is as a means of assuring the judge of the event to which the confession has been made. In the present article, an attempt has been made to examine the validity of the confession in proving the case with a descriptive-analytical method. In this regard, it is examined whether a criminal judge can issue a sentence as soon as the accused confesses, and this validity remains until the judge is aware of its inaccuracy? Or that the sentence can be issued only on the basis of a confession when the judge is satisfied with it? And basically, this persuasion can be based on confession alone or does it need other supporting evidence? In order to answer these questions, while briefly studying the legal system of some Islamic countries, the issue has been specifically examined from the perspective of the Codified regulations, legal doctrine and judicial procedure of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The superficial conflict between the approach of the Islamic Penal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure on this issue has added to the complexity of the issue, which makes it necessary to rely on interpretive methods to accept the relevant validity of the criminal confession.
Criminal Law
Sayyed Hosein Ale Taha; Hosein Aghaei; aref bashiri
Abstract
There are fundamental questions and obvious differences between the jurists regarding the guarantee or non-guarantee against the death of the convict and the additional punishment imposed on her during the issuance or execution of the sentence: Well-known jurists have considered the loss of one's blood ...
Read More
There are fundamental questions and obvious differences between the jurists regarding the guarantee or non-guarantee against the death of the convict and the additional punishment imposed on her during the issuance or execution of the sentence: Well-known jurists have considered the loss of one's blood to be based on the rule that "No Blood Money for the One Killed Due to Legal Punishment". Some jurists also citing some religious generalities, have believed to Lack of guarantees pent to Lack of extremes in Punishment and a few jurists, such as Sheikh Mufid, have distinguished between the rights of God and the rights of the people. This difference of opinion among scholars has also been transferred to the Islamic Penal Code, and there are contradictions in some legal articles that need to be examined. This article critiques each point of view in a descriptive-analytical way, along with their documentation and analysis of legal materials. The author's chosen opinion in substantiation of Guarantee for Punishment leading to the deprivation of life wherein permeate of wounds is not Arising from negligence. This claim is based on the priority of the evidence of the sanctity of the Muslim person's blood over other evidence, the generalities of the murder, and also agrees with the scholarly view of Khansari in one of her possibilities and It explicitly complies with Article 13 of the Islamic Penal Code and Note 185 of the Islamic Penal Code. According to the law, if deprive of life arising from Punishment is after warning of Judge enforcing the penalty, It removes the guarantee from him.
