Criminal Law
Nasrin Tabatabai Hesari; Soroush Safizade
Abstract
Anonymous Shell Companies as a tool for economic criming such as forgery, fraud, tax evasion, money laundering, terrorist financing, etc. have become widely developed in Iranian recent years and this has not only affects the country's judicial system;But also has led to disruptions in the country's tax ...
Read More
Anonymous Shell Companies as a tool for economic criming such as forgery, fraud, tax evasion, money laundering, terrorist financing, etc. have become widely developed in Iranian recent years and this has not only affects the country's judicial system;But also has led to disruptions in the country's tax system, the banking system, and the customs system. It has led to a decrease in public trust in the government,too. Undoubtedly, this emergence and expansion is due to the weakness of the system of observation, identification and supervision of all kinds of commercial companies and the Companies Registry System as the only organization that is specially related to the information of commercial companies can play a major role in dealing with the emergence of these companies. Therefore, this question can be raised that what problems in the Companies Registry System have caused the development of Anonymous Shell Companies and what solutions are there to solve these weaknesses.This research, with a descriptive-analytical method, based on desk researches and documentary studies, firstly identifies the concept and structure of Anonymous Shell Companies. Then the reasons for occurance and development of Anonymous Shell Companies have been investigated from the point of view of the Companies Registry System and after recognition of the registration system’s gaps in dealing with Anonymous Shell Companies, it provides solutions to solve the current problems.
Registration Law
Soroush Safizade
Abstract
The system of land property is a pluralistic system that is uniquely organized in each society based on the legal basis and necessity of that society. This pluralism can also be found to a large extent in land registration systems and the substantive effect of registration on the contractual transfer ...
Read More
The system of land property is a pluralistic system that is uniquely organized in each society based on the legal basis and necessity of that society. This pluralism can also be found to a large extent in land registration systems and the substantive effect of registration on the contractual transfer of immovable property. In such a way that some systems concentrate on creation effect of registration and others on opposability. The question, however, remains whether these different effects are due to the pluralism of the land property systems.On the other hand, Developments in the Iranian land registration system after 2016, which took place with the presentation of the Guardian Council's advisory opinion and the adoption of the Permanent Development Provisions Act, raised the question of the status of registration formalism in the contractual land transfer in Iran.In this study, based on the library studies and refer to legal documents method of collecting information and descriptive-analytical research method, with a comparative study of the three systems of England, Switzerland and France -as three model systems in the field of land property and registration– We concluded that the diversity of land registration systems is directly due to the diversity of countries' land property systems. In this regard, based on the two descriptions of absoluteness or exclusiveness, land property systems are divided into Property systems and Estate systems. In Property systems such as France, the land registration has an opposablility effect; While in Estate systems such as the England and Switzerland, registration has a creative effect.Accordingly, and within the framework of the ownership structure that has been established in the Iranian Land and Deeds Registration Act of 1931, land registration is still a title by registration system and developments after 2016 have only targeted the need to prepare notarial documents.
Private Law
Seyed Saeed Hashemi
Abstract
At the initiative of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, the Convention Abolishing the Need to Certify Official Documents of Foreign Government Documents was adopted in 1961. In 2012, the Islamic Republic of Iran approved the Act of "the Accession of the Government of the Islamic Republic ...
Read More
At the initiative of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, the Convention Abolishing the Need to Certify Official Documents of Foreign Government Documents was adopted in 1961. In 2012, the Islamic Republic of Iran approved the Act of "the Accession of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the Apostille Convention". However, the instruments of the accession to this convention have not yet been deposited to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands. So after several years, Iran is not considered a member of this convention. The main purpose of this convention is to facilitate the certification of documents as well as to facilitate the use of internal documents in other member states of the convention. By acceding to this convention, the consular representations that mediate the certification of documents are eliminated. This research uses a descriptive-analytical method to examine different parts of this convention and in each part analyzes the view of Iranian law based on the executive regulations of the Act of accession to the Convention and explains the appropriate solution in this regard. In the final part of the research, the consequences of accession to this convention are explained. With the passage of this Act, some domestic acts of Iran in reciprocal relations with the member states of this treaty have been implicitly abrogated, including the fourth paragraph of Article 1295 and Article 1296 of the Civil Code, as well as paragraph A of Article 2 of the Act of the Translation of statements and documents in courts and official offices. Accession to the convention also facilitates the attraction of foreign investment and reduces the outflow of foreign currency for certification. Therefore, Iran's accession to this convention is a positive step for the national interest and it is recommended to take other executive steps to join this treaty.
Registration Law
Reza Daryaee; Mostafa Karbalaei Aghazadeh
Abstract
Binding is one of the advantages of official documents which in some cases due to notable considerations is generalized to normal documents too. Beneficiaries of such documents, after attending document regulator office or registering department with execution, based on the case, can pursuit the execution ...
Read More
Binding is one of the advantages of official documents which in some cases due to notable considerations is generalized to normal documents too. Beneficiaries of such documents, after attending document regulator office or registering department with execution, based on the case, can pursuit the execution process via registration department. Determination of a competent authority for proceeding complaints of mentioned dual actions and the way of proceeding is one of the challenging matters in law of registration and jurisprudence. A question one may encounter is “Whether complaining execution in all cases, is in authority of the head of local registration office?” there are different answers for this question. In this research, the author will criticize the common attitude. Also while considering various articles, Supreme Court’s and High Council of Registers’ Judgments, the necessity of separation between cases, competent authority in proceeding complaints and the way of proceedings are defined. This article shows that examination of the execution process in some cases, in which they are just statements of right, without any legal aspect, is in the authority of the head of local registration office. And if there is any necessity for legal examination, the court is competent to do that.
Private Law
seyyed morteza tabatabaei; seyyed mohsen sadat akhavi
Abstract
One of the most important proofs of the lawsuit is the documents. Ordinary document is prestigious and valid, but the validity of all the documents is not the same, and the official documents have a certain positive validity and power. By the Law on the Registration of Documents and Real Estate in 1931 ...
Read More
One of the most important proofs of the lawsuit is the documents. Ordinary document is prestigious and valid, but the validity of all the documents is not the same, and the official documents have a certain positive validity and power. By the Law on the Registration of Documents and Real Estate in 1931 AD the registration of documents for all transactions and transactions concerning the interests and interests of immovable property was compulsory. Following the implementation of this law, and in light of the issuance of different judicial opinions in this regard, in 2017 AD the law of permanent rulings on development plans of the country was passed and in Article 62 of this law was enacted on the validity of regulatory documents. The subject matter of this article is limited to transactions involving immovable property and does not rule out formal ownership. The last part of Article 62, "Except for documents that are based on the recognition of a court having a religious validity ..." as an exception, is a new judgment that is ambiguous and may lead to the elimination of the original function Official documents in the community. In order to address these ambiguities, it is necessary to distinguish between property rights and contract law in the interpretation of Article 62. It can be said that as long as the documents with the rights of the holder of the official document are not in conflict, these documents are valid and in the relationship of the parties to the transaction are correct and the source, but when confronted with the ownership of the owner of the official document can not be the source of ownership transfer, in this case, against the holder The official document is not cited and can not be in conflict with the official document.
