Private Law
Yasser Gholami; Meysam Javadi; Mohammad Bagher Moghaddasi
Abstract
The enforcement of verdict is the most important stage of the litigation process in which attempted to execution of the verdict through the introduction and identification of the property of losing party. In this regard, a large part of the Civil Verdicts Enforcement Act and the Execution Method of Financial ...
Read More
The enforcement of verdict is the most important stage of the litigation process in which attempted to execution of the verdict through the introduction and identification of the property of losing party. In this regard, a large part of the Civil Verdicts Enforcement Act and the Execution Method of Financial Convictions Act dedicated to this issue. A look to these laws shows that laws generally recognize customary objective property and stated the manner in which the judgment debt can be executed from there. However, in the last decade, following the development of new technologies, digital currencies have emerged as rivals of real currencies and have gained public acceptance. Although laws on these currencies has not been approved in Iranian legal System so far, but the doctrine and judicial procedure has issued that these currencies is property. In this regard, this question arises if at the time of execution of the verdict, digital currency identified and introduced - as the property of the losing property– does the convict can be executed from these currencies? According to the results of this research, the answer to this question is yes. This study, after mentioning an introduction on the nature of digital currencies, deals with the issue of the ability to identify, seize and sell digital currencies and some of its important sub-categories. Although the relevant laws do not provide for a regulation on these currencies, the implementation of judicial rulings from these currencies will be facilitated by relying on the general principles governing the implementation of rulings and the formulation of transparent rules in the future and training of judges. It will prevent the fragmentation of procedures. This research tries to answer the issues that are raised in the implementation of court rulings from the place of digital currencies in a descriptive-analytical method.
Private Law
Mostafa Elsan; MohammadReza Manouchehri; sajad mazloumi
Abstract
Detention of a convicted person in a civil case is considered an exceptional subject. In the Iranian legal system, it is applied as a last resort for a situation where the convict is not willing to execute the convictions in any way and no property is found from him. The jurists - and following them ...
Read More
Detention of a convicted person in a civil case is considered an exceptional subject. In the Iranian legal system, it is applied as a last resort for a situation where the convict is not willing to execute the convictions in any way and no property is found from him. The jurists - and following them the Iranian legal system - have always been cautious in this regard and the legislator is under different assumptions such as filing a petition for insolvency or finding property of the convict, and denies his/her detention. In this paper, we examine the conditions and challenges to the detention of a convicted person in civil matters and we will discuss the legal and practical problems of the issue. Rare cases in which the possibility of detaining a convicted person is not explicitly stated by law, including arbitral awards, foreign awards, restoration of executive operations and the impossibility of enforcing an objective award, are examined in this article, relying on judicial procedure and practical problems.
Private Law
Amirhossein Alizadeh
Abstract
According to the law on the Implementation of Financial Convictions, approved by the Islamic Consultative Assembly on 15/7/1393 and the Expediency Council on 23/3/1394 imprisonment is one way to achieve financial right, but in addition to the request of plaintiff and adoption of the court, it is necessary ...
Read More
According to the law on the Implementation of Financial Convictions, approved by the Islamic Consultative Assembly on 15/7/1393 and the Expediency Council on 23/3/1394 imprisonment is one way to achieve financial right, but in addition to the request of plaintiff and adoption of the court, it is necessary extra conditions. Authority of the court and plaintiff is not absolute. In addition, it is exceptional and In case of doubt, the general principle rules should be applied.In addition, the term of imprisonment is not specified. Identifying the nature of insolvence requires identifying type of confrontation to wealthy that is confrontation between inexistence and potency.However the definition of the legislator in article 6 and its note, as well as the admission for installment in Article 11, indicates that the legislature does not have same attitude .Moreover this article does not comply with the petition for insolvency or wealthy in Article 7 and the recent article also has conditions for proof of insolvency that is criticized.
