Private Law
ABBAS Mirshekari; Fateme Sadat Hosseini; afrouz samadi
Abstract
Losing expected benefit means benefits, which have not been existed yet, but have the potential to come into existence. Considering this kind of loss as a compensable damages has always been a controversial issue. The incertitude is mostly because the loss itself and its measures cannot be evaluated ...
Read More
Losing expected benefit means benefits, which have not been existed yet, but have the potential to come into existence. Considering this kind of loss as a compensable damages has always been a controversial issue. The incertitude is mostly because the loss itself and its measures cannot be evaluated for certain. Therefore, determining reasonable evaluation method might make compensating this damage much easier. In this article, a general study is conducted on this subject and we have tried to focus on the methods of evaluating this kind of damage, considering the judicial procedure as well as the experience of other legal systems. It is thus proposed, in case the tortfeasor’s act has ceased the previous status/benefit of the injured person, the injured person’s previous status must be considered as the basis of compensation. Otherwise, when the tortfeasor’s act has deprived the injured person from gaining an expected (new) benefit, the status of his peers are held as the basis of compensation. Moreover, the extremity of the assessment of the loss of profit is usually until when the injured person is put back into his previous status. Otherwise, custom and law are the two elements, which are used in order to determine this extremity.
Private Law
Ali kazemi
Abstract
The theory of questionable litigation as a result of the new economic approach to contracts, in the 2016 amendments to the French Civil Code, in three legal articles 1123, 1158, 1183 and with the aim of creating security and legal certainty about the fate of contracts for third parties or the counterparty ...
Read More
The theory of questionable litigation as a result of the new economic approach to contracts, in the 2016 amendments to the French Civil Code, in three legal articles 1123, 1158, 1183 and with the aim of creating security and legal certainty about the fate of contracts for third parties or the counterparty of the contractual beneficiary, to was used and it is considered among the innovations and attractiveness of the new French contract law. This theory gives the third party or the counterparty of the definitive or possible beneficiary of the contracts the right to oblige the beneficiary to answer questions, in In case of non-response and clarification, the definite or possible beneficiary within a reasonable and conventional deadline, his right against the questioner will be considered forfeited, and legal security and certainty will prevail in the contract, and contrary to the traditional rights of contracts, the owner in a nosy contract with his original silence forced him to break the contract and file numerous lawsuits. In this theory, another right has been created for the principal. The application of this theory in Iran's contract law does not face any particular obstacle and until the amendment of Iran's civil law, the platform for the implementation of this theory is available, and due to its high economic efficiency and guarantee of legal security, its implementation will be useful and effective, and it will prevent the filing of lawsuits. It will prevent a lot, including the enforcement and rejection of transactions against the right of the beneficiary in the courts of justice.
Private Law
Sajad Elmi; Ali Gharibe; Ismaeil Saghiri
Abstract
In the last part of Article 244 of the Civil Code, the legislator stipulates: "... the condition of corollary cannot be revocable" therefore, in order to explain the aforementioned ruling the majority of law scholars have stated that in cases where the condition of corollary is formed by the ...
Read More
In the last part of Article 244 of the Civil Code, the legislator stipulates: "... the condition of corollary cannot be revocable" therefore, in order to explain the aforementioned ruling the majority of law scholars have stated that in cases where the condition of corollary is formed by the creation itself, in terms of the fulfillment of the condition, the possibility of its revocation is unthinkable, and in the event that the fulfillment of the mentioned condition is impossible for some reason, basically no condition has been formed to talk about its revocation, however, this research has not been accepted by jurists. Jurisprudential studies also indicate that according to great jurists, it is not possible to revoke the condition of corollary. Therefore, this research with a descriptive-analytical method, while examining the theories of law scholars and great jurists, including arguing the legal mechanisms of suspension and timing, viewing the registration of the said condition, considers the last part of Article 244 of the aforementioned law indicating the irrevocability of the condition of corollary in most cases and by presenting new analyses infers the possibility of revocability of the said condition in a series of cases.
Private Law
Asghar zirak barougi
Abstract
The indivisibility of the obligation requires that the obligor fulfill the obligation in full at maturity; And the obligee is not required to accept part of the obligation. However, according to the second part of Article 277 of the Civil Code, the judge can give grace period according to the situation ...
Read More
The indivisibility of the obligation requires that the obligor fulfill the obligation in full at maturity; And the obligee is not required to accept part of the obligation. However, according to the second part of Article 277 of the Civil Code, the judge can give grace period according to the situation of the obligor. This sentence is taken from Article 1244 of the French Civil Code; But in practice it is abandoned Because in some recent laws, insolvency is a condition grace period to the debtor; And most courts do not rely on it in independent rulings. And most of the courts do not decision based on that. In this research, the historical origin, conditions and scope of grace period will be investigated. Is insolvency a condition for grace period? To be answered as a basic question. In short, we can say that grace period was introduced in ancient Rome and subsequently entered French law; And with several changes, finally in 2016, it was repeated with changes in Article 1342-4 of the French Civil Code. And with the conditions and in the absence of a legal prohibition, it is possible to grace period in financial obligations and it is not a condition to prove the insolvency.
Private Law
Ali Tahmasebi
Abstract
At the end of the lease contract, the tenant must vacate the property. However, in certain cases, even after the end of the contract, the legal rules may entitle him to continue his possession and do not recognize the lessor’s right to evict him. Therefore, despite the silence of the Civil Code, ...
Read More
At the end of the lease contract, the tenant must vacate the property. However, in certain cases, even after the end of the contract, the legal rules may entitle him to continue his possession and do not recognize the lessor’s right to evict him. Therefore, despite the silence of the Civil Code, it can be said that if the lessee has created constructions (building, planting trees, digging a well, etc.) with the lessor’s permission, the latter one cannot evict him from the property at the end of the contract, because people invest (construct a building) thinking that the legal system supports their reasonable expectations, and the lack of sufficient support for this expectation will destroy the incentive to invest and will have harmful effects on the economy. Also, in cases where due to the lack of legal permission for transferring endowed properties, the ownership documents of individuals have been annulled by special laws, the law recognizes them the right of priority in possession and the lessor cannot demand for their eviction unless the extension of the contract is not compatible with endowment’s interest.
Private Law
sajjad shahbaz ghahfarrokhi
Abstract
After adopting the theory of contributory negligence and dismissing the All-or-Nothing Rule, the issue of how to determine the extent of loss and victim fault was raised in fault-based civil liability. The key question is whether there is a difference between the defendant's fault and the plaintiff's. ...
Read More
After adopting the theory of contributory negligence and dismissing the All-or-Nothing Rule, the issue of how to determine the extent of loss and victim fault was raised in fault-based civil liability. The key question is whether there is a difference between the defendant's fault and the plaintiff's. If the same act has been done by both sides and the other essential elements are the same, should the responsibility be equally shared by the two perpetrators, regardless of whether they are plaintiff or defendant? The European principles of civic responsibility and the prevailing theory of common law have adopted a "symmetrical approach to victim and defendant's behavior in determining each one's fault" and equally, have considered the standard of reasonable care in evaluating their behavior. This view has been tempered in various ways and certain exceptions have been made to it in the Common law legal system. Similarly, from the point of view of economic analysis and moral criticism, there are some objections to this theory. This view, despite its popularity, seems to have left much criticism unanswered. In depicting an apt theory to address this issue, it will count as a step forward to explain and criticize the mainstream theory.
Private Law
Abbas Mirshekari
Abstract
The individualization of criminal writ petitions in the international arena, such the use of celebrities’ identities in commercial advertising has increased nowadays. Legal systems have also tried to protect the rights of these individuals from being used without their permission. For example, ...
Read More
The individualization of criminal writ petitions in the international arena, such the use of celebrities’ identities in commercial advertising has increased nowadays. Legal systems have also tried to protect the rights of these individuals from being used without their permission. For example, according to the United States of America’s law, right of pre-emption is recognized. Publicity Right means that exploitation of another personality with his permission. Although the scope of this right includes both celebrities and ordinary people, but it is claimed mainly by famous people to fence their interests. Although there is no doubt about this right but there are disagreements over its realm: “Can an exception be made for this right or, any possible use of another personality is subject to the permission of the person?” In American law, full implementation of this right is known as a violation of freedom of expression. For this reason, this right has been modified and, in particular, its boundaries have been defined by freedom of expression. The most important challenge in this direction is determining the criteria for distinguishing the realm of the right. Various criteria are presented for this purpose. The most important criterion is the theory of fair use. Accordingly, if a person changes the identity of a celebrity and transform it into another form or, if the intention of the individual is to disseminate information about a famous person, his action will be justified. In fact, in these two cases, the right of publicity will be sacrificed at the expense of more important value: freedom of speech. In this article, we are trying to provide suggestions for the Iranian legal system by studying the USA legal system.
Private Law
Dr. Seyyed Mostafa mohaghegh damad; khashayar esfandiari far
Abstract
Law and justice are closely linked, and decisions that do not conform to justice and fairness are not willingly executed, leading to resorting to all kinds of deceit to escape from it. The link between law and justice can be observed in many judicial decisions, and one of the manifestations of justice ...
Read More
Law and justice are closely linked, and decisions that do not conform to justice and fairness are not willingly executed, leading to resorting to all kinds of deceit to escape from it. The link between law and justice can be observed in many judicial decisions, and one of the manifestations of justice in judicial decisions is the lawsuit for damages by the plaintiff. Nowadays, in various contracts, especially commercial ones, the pledgee tries to put pressure on the pledger and to ensure that he she fulfills the pledge, sums of money are assigned to the pledge agreement as a consideration. In some cases, the pledgee, for various reasons, such as economic fluctuations or negligence and shortcomings, refuses to perform the contractual obligations (in part or in full), resulting in encountering an enormous amount of contractual loss, which sometimes exceeds the contract value. In this type of litigation, the role of judges and, in fact, the judgments are very strong and some courts consider the "principle of interpretation in the light of the whole contract", "the administration of justice and fairness as a rule" and "the illegality of the condition", deviating from Article 230 of the Civil Code and order payment of the obligation by modifying its amount or removing the above-mentioned condition and holding it in accordance with justice. In the present paper, several instances of judicial opinions are mentioned in this regard and their arguments are analyzed.
Private Law
Abdolsaeed Badiei; farhad PARVIN
Abstract
Certain Authorities of Religious Minorities in Iran’s Act and theEffects of Their DecisionsOne the innovations in the new act of family support is observed in article 4 for the authorities of religiousminorities. Concerning the competence of these authorities and their relationships with the judicial ...
Read More
Certain Authorities of Religious Minorities in Iran’s Act and theEffects of Their DecisionsOne the innovations in the new act of family support is observed in article 4 for the authorities of religiousminorities. Concerning the competence of these authorities and their relationships with the judicial courts,legislators deny the competence of the general courts in hearing the minority affairs based on their religiouscommonalities and certain rules and habits. Moreover, given that these authorities are competent to hear thepersonal status and non-litigious affairs of the religious minorities and are legally recognized to do so, they canbe, to some extent, considered as an exceptional part of the judicial judgment institution. As a result, theirdecisions are valid in the courts and are ratified and enforced if they are compatible with the public order andmorality.Keywords: religious minorities, certain authorities, common and certain rules and habits, judicial system,judicial authority
Private Law
Hasan Badini; Mohammad khakbaz
Abstract
Inflation affects fulfillment of financial obligations or non-financial contracts with financial effects such as marriage portion in marriage contract. Inflation renders fulfillment of obligations sometimes impossible or delayed and sometimes with great distress and constriction. Solutions must be devised ...
Read More
Inflation affects fulfillment of financial obligations or non-financial contracts with financial effects such as marriage portion in marriage contract. Inflation renders fulfillment of obligations sometimes impossible or delayed and sometimes with great distress and constriction. Solutions must be devised in such conditions for just interpretation and execution of contract and prevention of abuse of right by the obligee as abuse of right is prohibited (Principle 40 of the Constitution law and Doctrine of LA ZARAR). Means such as cancellation of contract by the obligor using option of impossibility of submission of consideration, granting just deadline to the obligee, adjustment of contract, claim of delay damages or day price in delayed monetary obligations can help balancing between the parties' rights. However, it must be taken into account that making contractual conditions just needs to be in compliance with valid legal principles. Also, a solution for a legal issue is not necessarily similar to the other one due to the special relativity of humanities in general and law in particular and the fact that justice is a relative, flexible and fragile concept.
Private Law
LATIF EBADPOUR; sayed mohammadsadeg mousavi
Abstract
Agency is subrogation and based on the majority of Shi'a jurisprudents and Iranian civil law an irrevocable agency is a kind of agency in which the agent's agency or the failure to dismiss him as a condition for the outcome of the contract is required. Today, irrevocable agency has become more prominent ...
Read More
Agency is subrogation and based on the majority of Shi'a jurisprudents and Iranian civil law an irrevocable agency is a kind of agency in which the agent's agency or the failure to dismiss him as a condition for the outcome of the contract is required. Today, irrevocable agency has become more prominent among traders than what it deserves and the trade conventions of the past decade have considered the irrevocable agency as a contract in which a person (the client) through obtaining the cost of his financial rights and signing the document gives that property or right to another person (agent) and cannot have any claim over that property or right. However, the condition of the agency or not being dismissed during necessary agreement does not change the nature of the agency and does not result in the change of the nature of agency from permission and subrogation to an eternal phenomenon. With such a condition, the client cannot dismiss the agent and in other sentences the permissible contracts, such as its dissolution due to the death and insanity of both sides, will not be influential. The present article aims at highlighting the weak points of an irrevocable agency and presenting a new pattern capable of replacing with it. The proposed template is a "transfer of sale right contract'' which is qualified enough to compete with death and insanity. ''Right of sale" as one of the components of property right has the necessary capabilities to replace the permission and representation. The focus of the text is on the fact that this capability should be proved taking into account the existing legal capacity so that any possible shortcomings can be solved through legislator's intervention.
Private Law
morteza ghasemzadeh; fatemeh nouri
Abstract
If person owe to another with different reason and pay sum to paying off his debt; the article 282 civil law authorize to him for choosing that for which debt is this payment. In order to entitle the debtor for this selection; some conditions are needed; among the most momentous of these conditions is ...
Read More
If person owe to another with different reason and pay sum to paying off his debt; the article 282 civil law authorize to him for choosing that for which debt is this payment. In order to entitle the debtor for this selection; some conditions are needed; among the most momentous of these conditions is the amount of payment and debt. In this regard there is a dubious assumption that shows there is conflict in some assumptions with article 277 that seems according to legislative supportive. Approach in article 282 and interpretation in favor of the debtor; all qualities shall be covered by the above article. Regarding the time interval that debtor has authority to exercise his above right different approaches is stated. In one hand existence of proofs in article 282 on the basis of deviate from the chosen method in French law and attention to jurisprudential comment in regarding of debtor’s option.In the other hand existence some theories base on staying the debtor’s right at the time of quarrel. It is all enlightening that debtor’s option in selecting one of the several debts in article 282 is absolute and conditioning both time of debt settlement and litigation time.
