Majid Akbarpour; Abolfazl Mohebbi; Khadijeh Nazari
Abstract
Natural obligations is one of various kinds of obligations that there are diferent viewpoints on its basis and nature. these are obligations in which, the obligee has no claim right but if the obligor voluntarily fulfilled the obligation, his/her claim for restitution will not be admissible. the question ...
Read More
Natural obligations is one of various kinds of obligations that there are diferent viewpoints on its basis and nature. these are obligations in which, the obligee has no claim right but if the obligor voluntarily fulfilled the obligation, his/her claim for restitution will not be admissible. the question here is :what is the legal nature of natural obligation? what are its instances? And which legal rule) from economic principles) is more efficient and desirable about such obligations? Using the jurisprudence juridical and economic principles, can said that, prohibition of unlawful possession or prohibition of unlawful utilization of a property is the best legal establishment that illustrates basis and nature of natural obligations. Moreover, time lapse debts, leniency contracts debts, denied by oath, debts related to credibility of judgment and kinfolks (relatives) past alimony can be counted as instances of natural obligations. Also observing social costs, provisions of article 266 of civil code on inadmissibility of claim for restitution of debtor who has paid the real debt, as a legal source in natural obligations is efficient
Mohammad Hassan Sadeghi Moghadam; behnam Ghafari Farsani
Abstract
Competition law is conceived as one of the most important factors in the success of free market economic systems. The idea is that if free competition exists among activists at production and distribution of goods and services, economic efficiency and ultimately total welfare will increase. While this ...
Read More
Competition law is conceived as one of the most important factors in the success of free market economic systems. The idea is that if free competition exists among activists at production and distribution of goods and services, economic efficiency and ultimately total welfare will increase. While this new branch of law has long provoked fascinating interdisciplinary discussions among economists and lawyers, the legal system of Iran has recently taken the first step in this field. So it is required that from now that the underlying premises and principles of this area of law are properly discussed and examined to pave the way for deeper future researches. Certainly one of the most important and basic questions about any new regulations which it is of a determinant role in interpreting their provisions, is goals which those regulations seek to achieve. Lawyers and legal systems have no consensus on objectives of competition law. Generally, multiple goals for the said regulations are conceivable that sometimes run at odds with each in execution stage. The following article, relying on Iran legal system is to explain the objectives of competition law. It shows that the “Soul” of competition law is the preservation of competition to promote efficiencies for consumers.