Criminal Law
Amin Fallah; hasan hajitabar firozjaee
Abstract
The Code of Criminal Procedure adopted in 1392 with subsequent amendments and additions, except for crimes under the jurisdiction of the Judicial Organization of the Armed Forces, preliminary investigation of crimes of persons under 15 years of age under the jurisdiction of juvenile court and preliminary ...
Read More
The Code of Criminal Procedure adopted in 1392 with subsequent amendments and additions, except for crimes under the jurisdiction of the Judicial Organization of the Armed Forces, preliminary investigation of crimes of persons under 15 years of age under the jurisdiction of juvenile court and preliminary investigation of crimes of persons aged 15 to 18 years Shamsi, with the exception of crimes against chastity, has considered the 7th and 8th degree ta'zir crimes under the jurisdiction of a branch of the city's Public and Revolutionary Prosecutor's Office as the Special Juvenile Court. However, according to Article 315 of this law, crimes subject to the jurisdiction of the First Criminal Court, as well as the Revolution, in cases that are tried by multiple judges, if committed by adults under the age of 18, a special juvenile criminal court will try them. شد. However, this law is ambiguous in terms of competent authorities for conducting preliminary investigations and prosecuting crimes under Article 302 committed by minors and adults under 15 years of age. The authors, in this article, based on the legal standards and general principles of criminal law, come to this conclusion. It was concluded that in the case of persons under the age of fifteen, if the person is a minor, the preliminary investigation and trial of public crimes or revolution covered by Article 302 of this law will be carried out by the juvenile court, but if the perpetrator is under the age of 15, the reference Preliminary investigation and trial, the criminal court is a special case for juvenile delinquency.
Criminal Law
Hadi Rostami; Seyed Poria Mousavi
Abstract
Achievements of different knowledge such as criminology and penology and also the use of answering experiences to criminals, show that equivalent giving response and answering to crimes perpetrators, were inefficient and that lead to stabilizing crimes of the juvenile offender. In the meantime, documents ...
Read More
Achievements of different knowledge such as criminology and penology and also the use of answering experiences to criminals, show that equivalent giving response and answering to crimes perpetrators, were inefficient and that lead to stabilizing crimes of the juvenile offender. In the meantime, documents and international regulations of human rights also with an emphasis on different components are still in search of blockage of the cycle of becoming a habit of delinquent of this category of citizens. The best interests of a juvenile offender, that as a strategic and fundamental principle was important for system of the criminal policy of united nations, and considered as an index so that internal criminal policymakers of countries by that can make a decision about choosing methods for removal and stop of the relationship of children and teens with a criminal process forever and can be provided as a goal. By these changes in 2013 and following paragraph 1 of article 3 of the convention on the rights of the children, the criminal justice system of Iran tried to respect this principle and, in the light of readings of it, select a cohesive policy and that to what extent it was successful, is a subject that this writing will consider it. Because it seems that on one hand legislator had tried to respect the bests interests of juvenile in punishable crimes and on the other hand, try to respect laws (limits and retaliation) that in this way had faced significant duality.
Criminal Law
Mehrnoosh Abozari
Abstract
Despite the adoption of differential criminal policy in the field of juvenile offenses against adults and the admission of people under the age of 18 as a group of children and adolescents under certain domestic and international laws, the age range and the commencement of criminal responsibility have ...
Read More
Despite the adoption of differential criminal policy in the field of juvenile offenses against adults and the admission of people under the age of 18 as a group of children and adolescents under certain domestic and international laws, the age range and the commencement of criminal responsibility have remained controversial. From the point of view that the Atomic attitude towards the initiation of criminal responsibility is absolute in the girl of 9 years and in the 15-year-old boy of the whole lunar age, or that the formation of criminal responsibility and the readiness of the acceptance of punishment are gradual, Each stage of development is progressively graded, from the mild to the full scale.This is due to the author's view of the dominance of Aristotelian logic in the legislator's view that the adoption of a fuzzy view and application of this view in the discussion of the age of criminal responsibility can be categorized by criminal responsibility and the punishment of perpetrators by category. Shape their age and guide cohesion in legislator performance and judgment towards discriminatory criminal policy. By doing this research, the author is trying to investigate the feasibility and the way of applying fuzzy attitude in the age of criminal responsibility. Does this attitude contribute to the development of a child and adolescent support system and the integrity of the process? Therefore, while explaining the fuzzy attitude and the necessity of its application in different domains, its rules in the area of criminal responsibility are presented by fuzzy diagrams and fuzzy inference system, so that the necessity of applying fuzzy attitude and how to apply fuzzy calculations in drawing the relationship with age are presented. State the degree of criminal responsibility and the type of punishment and the benefits.
