Private Law
Hassan Badini; Saeed Siahbidi Kermanshahi
Abstract
Conflict of interests is the set of circumstances that create the risk that one's decisions or professional actions in relation to a person who trusts him or her will be affected by personal interests. Conflict of interests is one of the concepts that is essential for proper understanding in any field, ...
Read More
Conflict of interests is the set of circumstances that create the risk that one's decisions or professional actions in relation to a person who trusts him or her will be affected by personal interests. Conflict of interests is one of the concepts that is essential for proper understanding in any field, because a proper understanding of this concept and its contexts provides the way for its proper management. The main question of the present study is what are the dimensions and scope of the conflict of interest in private law? The authors believe that the constituent elements of conflict of interests is profit, conflict, judgment and relationship. The presence of these elements in the relationships of individuals irrespective of whether the relationship is public law or private law creates a conflict of interests. This study has shown that conflict of interests in private law can be achieved either in a trust-based relationship (such as a lawyer-client relationship) or in a relationship based on impartiality (such as litigation) and Conflict of interests are not conceivable in other relationships. In this study, some of the most important instances that may be confused with the discussion of conflict of interests have been highlighted. Understanding instances of conflict of interests is a prelude to the legal management of these conflicts to avoid their harmful effects or to compensate them. In this article, the legal management strategy of these conflicts and reform proposals for the Iranian legal system is explained.
Abdollah khodabakhshi
Abstract
The purpose of the proceeding and the issuance of judgment is the determination of the legal solution and it's performance between the parties. However sometimes for various reasons, there is no way to perform the judgment. This means that the enforcement of the judgment may be in conflict with the rights ...
Read More
The purpose of the proceeding and the issuance of judgment is the determination of the legal solution and it's performance between the parties. However sometimes for various reasons, there is no way to perform the judgment. This means that the enforcement of the judgment may be in conflict with the rights of third parties or its subject may be changed or administrative obstacles cause to cease the execution of it. In some cases, the enforcement of judgment also needs to preconditions that it can't be established and implemented without the independent proceeding and with respect to the right of defense. In fact, the principles of due process for example the hearing parties statement, giving the opportunity to defense and the complaint against the court decision must be followed also in the enforcement stage and Hence, sometimes it must be stopped the enforcement of judgment. These cases have not a certain criteria in jurisprudence. One of the its reasons is the lack of supervision of excellent authorities over the executive orders because most decisions in the implementation stage are through administrative orders and the beneficiary can't complain about them. Due to defect in the legal literature (doctrine) and fitful jurisprudence, the effects of unenforceability of judgment exactly are not clear. In fact, the main question is, can it be possible to enforce a definitive judgment? And if the answer is positive, what is the criterion of it? It seems there are exceptions in judicial review to failure for implementing of definitive judgments and seems the most important criterion can be seen in practical problems and changing the subject of judgment. Hence in the present article, these issues will be considered.