Public Law
Alireza Dabirnia
Abstract
AbstractOn the one hand, existence of any ambiguity in explaining the status of development program rules in Iranian legal system, may bring this assumption to mind that some of the acts of parliament have a dominant position in relation to other laws. This assumption is reinforced when the program rules ...
Read More
AbstractOn the one hand, existence of any ambiguity in explaining the status of development program rules in Iranian legal system, may bring this assumption to mind that some of the acts of parliament have a dominant position in relation to other laws. This assumption is reinforced when the program rules is recognized as a supreme law in some procedures. In this situation, a legal issue arises; Privileged status under the constitution is not recognised but actually the hierarchy of laws in Iran's legal system, faced with a fundamental change. When the set of rules have a single unit in the Iranian legal system, how can recognized and extend the feature's constitution and its consequences to an ordinary law, even if parliament approve it under the program rules?On the other hand, it is possible when we determine the top position for program rules, certainly impose the specific format and limitation of legislative initiative to parliament. When a program rules impose to forces, It is possible that the most important duties of government institutions be affected by the program rules and some of the duties that explicitly stated in the constitution, run out priorities.
Ayat Moulaee
Abstract
This paper has discussed the concept of the administrative contracts in France, England and Iran with emphasis on obstacles of institutionalizing it in Iran legal system. At first, the concept of administrative contract has been explained from formal viewpoint and has been concluded that all of them ...
Read More
This paper has discussed the concept of the administrative contracts in France, England and Iran with emphasis on obstacles of institutionalizing it in Iran legal system. At first, the concept of administrative contract has been explained from formal viewpoint and has been concluded that all of them are similar and follow the unit approach unless about the courts; in France administrative courts have capacity to administrative contracts. But in Iran and England, the ordinary courts have capacity to all contracts. In second part, the legal terms of administrative contract has been discussed in three legal systems from context viewpoints and have been concluded that in France, the concept of contractual acts have encompassed legal institution with particular and independent principles and rules, that are distinguished from contracts of private law. But in Iran and England, in first viewpoint, the principles and rules of private law encompass all contracts. Notwithstanding, the legislatures in these two countries have passed laws that are similar to administrative contracts of France from the context viewpoint. Although, they are different from the wording viewpoint, there are functional similarities among administrative contract of France, public contract of Iran and public or government contract of England. Notwithstanding, the conception and interpretation of contractual acts according to private law in jurisprudences of Iran impeded the institutionalization of the concept of administrative contract in Iran.
Mehdi Shahabi; Maryam Jalali
Abstract
The basis, the source and the goal of a legal rule may be considered as the three main bodies of each legal system. Undoubtedly, for the formation of the concept of a legal system, a sort of relation and cohesion between the said bodies deems necessary. The source of a legal rule, or instrument of the ...
Read More
The basis, the source and the goal of a legal rule may be considered as the three main bodies of each legal system. Undoubtedly, for the formation of the concept of a legal system, a sort of relation and cohesion between the said bodies deems necessary. The source of a legal rule, or instrument of the expression of a legal rule, and also the goal of the rules and the legal institutions, in any legal system, are influenced by the basis and the source of binding force of the rules in the legal system, in question. In other words, any answer as to the source of binding character of a legal rule, either a metaphysical or realistic one, would affect the type of sources of the legal rule and even their functions, whether subjective role of the law or its objective one. The type of interaction and the relation between sources and the horizontal or hierarchical link between them, are both in religious and non-religious legal systems dependent on the nature and concept of basis as well as binding source of legal rules.
