Public Law
Ayat mulaee; fatemeh mirahmadi
Abstract
Supporting production and business requires identifying challenges and barriers in various areas. One of the most important of these areas is obtaining contract insurance, especially contracting contracts in the current practice of the Social Security Organization and the claims' assessment boards of ...
Read More
Supporting production and business requires identifying challenges and barriers in various areas. One of the most important of these areas is obtaining contract insurance, especially contracting contracts in the current practice of the Social Security Organization and the claims' assessment boards of this organization there is no precise and logical criterion for calculating the contract premiums. This situation has become one of the most contentious issues in the branches of the Administrative Court of Justice and the votes of many claims assessment boards are violated for various formal and substantive reasons, which require serious attention. So, this question has been answered: What are the most important challenges and causes of violation of claims in the branches of the Court of Administrative Justice? In answer to this question, using the research method: descriptive-analytical, the most important results are as follows: First, there are various challenges, such as how to calculate and obtain premiums, the composition of claims assessment boards, and the determination of premiums based on audits of financial offices. Secondly, these challenges indicate a lack of indicators, principles and conditions governing the receipt of premiums in the relevant legal documents that need to be corrected.
Private Law
Koorosh Ostovar Sangari
Abstract
AbstractOne of the issues raised after the establishment of the Administrative Court of Justice was who can appear as a plaintiff in the Administrative Court of Justice and whether state agencies can appear as a plaintiff in the Administrative Court of Justice. According to the rulings No. 37, 38 and ...
Read More
AbstractOne of the issues raised after the establishment of the Administrative Court of Justice was who can appear as a plaintiff in the Administrative Court of Justice and whether state agencies can appear as a plaintiff in the Administrative Court of Justice. According to the rulings No. 37, 38 and 39 of the Court of Administrative Justice in 1368, state agencies can in no way be present in the branches of the Court of Administrative Justice as a plaintiff. This decision was approved by the General Assembly of the Supreme Court in No. 602 in 1374, but the question was raised that what is the task of the state apparatus in relation to matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of Administrative Justice? In 2007, the General Assembly of the Supreme Court, Decision No. 699, tried to somehow open this deadlock and find a solution to this problem. However, these votes of the General Assembly of the Supreme Court created other problems, hence the vote of unity. Procedure No. 792 was issued in July 2016 and has somehow annulled votes No. 602 and 699. The author believes that vote 972 is a positive development in the separation of powers of the Court of Administrative Justice and public courts.Keywords: Procedural Unity Vote, Jurisdiction, Administrative Court of Justice, Public Court,State.
Public Law
ali mohammad fallahzadeh; mohammad najafi kalyani
Abstract
Most of judgements of the administrative court of justice in relation to the title of " garden" have been issued about the identifying a competent authority for its recognition. In this regard, after the enactment of the law on the reform of the law on the conservation and development of greenbelt in ...
Read More
Most of judgements of the administrative court of justice in relation to the title of " garden" have been issued about the identifying a competent authority for its recognition. In this regard, after the enactment of the law on the reform of the law on the conservation and development of greenbelt in cities in 2009 and the formation of the "Article 7 commission", the court's inappropriate procedure in identifying the "article 12 commission of the land-urban law" as a competent authority for recognition the garden was refurbished. In contrast, and because of misinterpretations of the governing laws, one of the issues that have overlooked by the judges was the attention to characteristics of the "garden" and its nature. The present text deals with the court's different and sometimes divergent procedures on the above issues. Also, the nature of article 7 commission and its decisions to identify the competent authority to overseeing them, as well as the decision-making authority for changing the use of gardens, are other issues besides identifying the competent authority to identify the garden, that form the main concern of this article.
Public Law
Mohammad Hasanvand; mina akbari
Abstract
The high-standing status of the written law in Iran's legal system has been manifested as an obvious and unchangeable affair in the ideas of legal thinkers. However, in the field of administrative law, particularly the law of employment, causes such as politically affected legislative system and non-pursuit ...
Read More
The high-standing status of the written law in Iran's legal system has been manifested as an obvious and unchangeable affair in the ideas of legal thinkers. However, in the field of administrative law, particularly the law of employment, causes such as politically affected legislative system and non-pursuit of scientific and specialized ideas as well as repeated alterations of administrative rules have triggered unstable, dispersive, contradictory and cumulative rules to appear in this field, leading to inefficiency of rules. Law has been weak to play its inherent role as a predictable, regulative and decisive source and has followed diversified procedures of administrative authorities and branches of the Administrative Court of Justice. Among the other things, judges of the Administrative Court of Justice as administrative justice for obligating their adjudication and resolution of cases, have this ability to deal with this inefficiency while acting as judge of the branch, and members of specialized bodies and public bodies. The present paper has aimed to prove the mentioned claim, firstly by describing and naming applications of such laws and secondly by analyzing rules and ideas of the Administrative Court of Justice. The inefficiency of the legislative system in this area and the issuance of judicial rulings in the Administrative Court of Justice have implicitly identified the customary role of judicial regulation for the Court of Administrative Justice and somewhat similar to the position of the Supreme Court in the common law system. It has also promoted the status of the judiciary as the main source in Iran's administrative law system, such as the customary law system. However, the law itself is the first source of Administrative Law in Iran's Legal system.
