The influence of civil judicial decisions on criminal judgments, especially in the field of crimes against property, is stipulated in Article 18 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which is referred to as the rule of enforcement of criminal orders in civil litigation. The absolute acceptance of this rule without providing clear criteria has caused practical challenges in the judicial system. The present study uses a descriptive-analytical method to examine the criteria of this rule and the scope of its application, and its findings indicate that the implementation of this rule requires examining the relationship between the two main branches of the criminal and civil legal systems, explaining the common elements and concepts of civil and criminal law, paying attention to issues related to theproceedings, such as analysing the level of accuracy of criminal investigations, the criteria for issuing Enate, and paying attention to the difference between acquittal and conviction judgments in criminal matters. Considering these criteria leads us to the conclusion that there is a need to determine the scope of compliance in the law and that the civil judge should be able to evaluate the criminal verdict in specific cases merely as a clue, rather than having a definite obligation to accept it.