The Judiciarys Law Journal

The Judiciarys Law Journal

Analytical investigation of obstacles to the efficiency of specialized commercial chambers in Iranian law

Document Type : Research/Original/Regular Article

Author
 Private Law PHD, Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Humanities and Social Science, Kurdistan university, Sanandaj, Iran ,
10.22106/jlj.2024.2037077.6008
Abstract
Establishing a commercial court has been a failure experience in the legislative and judicial history of Iran. Even nearly a hundred years have passed since its dissolution, as if it could not remove the bitterness of its experience from the legislator's palate. Therefore, despite the necessity of forming such an authority to deal with commercial claims, the allocation of a branch of the general court as a specialized commercial branch is chosen as a solution with less cost and risk as an alternative to the dedicated commercial court, in order to meet the needs of businessmen in the field of dealing with His claims have been answered. But unfortunately, due to the structural limitations that exist in these specialized branches, such as hearing and issuing judgments only by the judge without the involvement and advice of businessmen, the lack of expert judges in the field of commercial affairs, the lack of a special procedural law and proceedings according to the general law of procedure. Civil proceedings, the need to deal with lawsuits based on the current substantive commercial laws, which are full of defects and cause delays in the proceedings, in practice, the efficiency expected from a specialized authority is not realized by these specialized chambers. In this research, the author uses a descriptive-analytical method and based on library studies, while providing suggestions to eliminate legal gaps in order to make the existing substantive and formal laws more efficient, forming a specialized commercial court instead of a dedicated court or specialized commercial chambers as a more efficient solution. It offers to deal with commercial lawsuits.
Keywords
Subjects

فهرست منابع:
 
الف. فارسی
 
§        بهره‌مند بگ‌نظر، حمید و عامری ثانی، امیرکیا و فرهمند، آذر و حاجی زاده، امیرحسین (1402) « سیاست حقوقی و پیشگیری از تشتت آرا؛ کاهش دامنه تفسیرپذیری قوانین از طریق یادداشت توضیحی و آزمایشگاه قضایی»، مجله حقوقی دادگستری، دوره 87، شماره 124
§        حسینی، سید احمد و عبدخدائی، زهره و شریف‌خانی، محمد (1402)، «کاربرد هوش مصنوعی در رسیدگی‌های قضایی، چالش شفافیت و راهکارهای آن»، دیدگاه‌های حقوق قضائی، دوره 28، شماره 101.
§        جوهر، سعید و نیکوند، شکرالله (1399)، «دادگاه­ها اقتصادی جایگزین محاکم تجاری، با مطالعه تطبیقی در نظام حقوقی فرانسه و بلژیک» تحقیقات حقوقی آزاد، دوره 13، شماره 49.
§        جوهر، سعید (۱۴۰۰)، بایسته‌های دادرسی تجاری، چاپ نخست، تهران: جاودانه
§        رهبری، ابراهیم و شعبان‌پور، علی (1401)، «چالش‌های کاربرد هوش مصنوعی به عنوان قاضی در دادرسی‌های حقوقی»، تحقیقات حقوقی ویژه‌نامه حقوق فناوری، دوره 25.
§        طباطبائی حصاری، نسرین و صفی‌زاده، سروش (1402)، «شرکت‌های کاغذی و راهکارهای مقابله با آن‌ها در پرتو آسیب شناسی نظام ثبت شرکت‌ها»، مجله حقوقی دادگستری، دوره 87، شماره 123.
§        علاالدینی، امیرعباس و آذربایجانی، علیرضا (1394)، «تبیین راهبردهای موجود در خصوص جلوگیری از ورشکستگی شرکت‌ها در لایحه تجارت و حقوق فرانسه»، مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی، دوره 6، شماره 24.
§        قاسمی حامد، عباس و غفوری اصل، غزل (1394)، «لزوم احیای دادگاه­های تجاری»، تحقیقات حقوقی، دوره 19، شماره 73.
§        قنواتی، جلیل و کهنمویی، اسماعیل (1389)، «بررسی نهاد بازسازی در قانون ایالات متحده و مقایسه آن با قرارداد ارفاقی»، مدرس علوم انسانی- پژوهش‌های حقوق تطبیقی، شماره 4 (پیاپی70).
§        مافی، همایون و افشار ونگینی، رحمان (1401)، «ایجاد دادگاه­های تجاری در راستای اصل سرعت در آیین دادرسی»، دانشنامه­های حقوقی، دوره 5، شماره 14.
§         مجاهد، افشین (1401)، «جایگاه دادگاه­های تجاری در حقوق ایران، فرانسه و انگلستان»، پژوهش­های حقوق تطبیقی عدل و انصاف، سال پنجم، شماره17.
§        مجاهد، افشین (1400)، «مطالعه تطبیقی آثار ورشکستگی در حقوق ایران و فرانسه»، پژوهش‌های حقوق تطبیقی عدل و انصاف، سال چهارم، شماره 15.
§        نریمانی، محمدرضا و میری، سید امیر احسان (1402)، دادگاه‌ها و دادرسی تجاری در نظام قضایی ایران، چاپ نخست، تهران: شهر دانش.
§        نوبهار، رحیم و قاسمی، مجتبی و صفاری، فاطمه (1402)، «چالش‌های تخصیص منابع مالی به قوه قضاییه در جمهوری اسلامی، مجله حقوقی دادگستری»، دوره 88، شماره 127
 
ب. انگلیسی
§  Adminstrative office of the U.S Court,(2016),The Federal Court System in The United State An Introdution For Judges And Judicial Adminstrator in Other Countries,published by Adminstrative office of the U.S Court 4th edition, available at: <https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/federalcourtssystemintheus.pdf> (last visited on 2024/04/22)
§  Baum, Lawrence, Judicial Specialization and the Adjudication of Immigration Case,(2010), Duke Law Journal, Vol 59, pp 1501-1561, available at: <https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol59/iss8/1/> (last visited on 2023/08/20)
§  Difiore, Janet (2018), “Electronoc Filing in The New York State”, Report of the Chief Administrative Judge to the Legislature, the Governor, and the Chief Judge of the State of New York, available at: <https://ww2.nycourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/files/2018-06/18_E-File_Report.pdf> (last visited on: 2024/08/18)
§  Easterbrook, Frank H , Afterword: on Being A Commercial Court,(1989), Chicago-Kent Law Review, vol 65, pp: 877-881 Available at: <https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol65/iss3/11> (last visited on 2023/08/13)
§  Haig, Robert L. (1996) "Can New York's New Commercial Division Resolve Business Disputes As Well As Anyone? " Touro Law Review, Vol 13, No 1,pp: 191-205, available at: <https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1633&context=lawreview>(last visited on 2023/09/1301)
§  HM Coutrs &Tribunals Service,(2022), “The Business and Property Courts of England & Wales”, (2022), 11th Edition, available at: < https://www.judiciary.uk/wp content/uploads/2022/06/Commercial-Court-Guide-11th-edition.pdf> (last visited on: 2024/08/17)
§  Mecham, Leonidas Ralph, Bankruptcy basics ,(2004), Administrative Office of the United States Courts,Rivised Second Edition, available at: <https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-JU10-PURL LPS44750/pdf/GOVPUB-JU10-PURL-LPS44750.pdf>(last visited on 2023/11/20)
§  Lye, Kc & Chan, Darius (2015), The Singapore International Commercial Court: a challenge to arbitration?”, Banking and Finance Disputes Rewive, Issue 07, available at: < https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/-/media/files/nrf/nrfweb/imported/banking-and-finance-disputes-review---issue-7.pdf?>, (last visited on: 2024/08/18)
§  Parish Matthew, (2015), “London’s Commercial Court sinks under its own weight”, Global Arbitration Review, available at: < https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/londons-commercial-court-sinks-under-its-own-weight-matthew-parish?trk=seokp_posts_ primary_cluster_res_title>> (last visited on: 2024/08/18)
§   Ramasubramanian, Justice V "Commercial Litigation or Litigation Commercial:Specialised Commercial Courts in India. National Law School Business Law Review: Vol. 1: Iss. 1 , Available at: < https://repository.nls.ac.in/nlsblr/vol1/iss1/7> (last visited on 2024/02/13)
§  Silversri, Elisabetta,(2014), “Judicial Specialization:In Search of the ‘Right’ Judge for Each Case”. RUSSIAN LAW JOURNAL, Vol 2 , Issue 4, 2014, pp 165-175, Available at:<https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281431554_Judicial_Specialization_In_search_of_the_'Right'_Judge_for_Each_Case > (last visited on 2024/04/03)
§  South China Morning Post (2014), “Singapore’s Planned International Commercial Court to Take Business Away from London and Hong Kong”, Report of Reuters in Singapore available at: <http://www.scmp.com/business/companies/article/1426528/singapores-planned-international-commercial- court. com>, (last visited on: 2024/08/18)
§  The Stationery Office, (2009) “Review of Civil Litigation Costs: Final Report”, Published by TSO (The Stationery Office) (UK). available at: < https://www.judiciary.uk/wp content/uploads/JCO/Documents/Reports/jackson-final-report-140110.pdf > (last visited on: 2024/08/17)
§  Vijay Damle, Sarang, (2005), “Specialize the judge, Not The Court: A Lesson From The German Constitutional Court”, Virginia Law Review Vol. 91, pp 1267-1311 ,available at: < https://virginialawreview.org/articles/specialize-judge-not-court-lesson-german-constitutional-court/ > (last visited on 2024/03/17)
§  Wang, Yu, (2007),"The Impact of Specialized Courts on the Federal Judicial System 1925-1981: bepress Legal Series.Working Paper available at: <https://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/1977> (last visited on 2024/05/01)
Volume 89, Issue 131
Autumn 2025
Pages 283-306

  • Receive Date 01 August 2024
  • Revise Date 19 September 2024
  • Accept Date 11 November 2024
  • First Publish Date 23 September 2025
  • Publish Date 23 September 2025