The Judiciarys Law Journal

The Judiciarys Law Journal

The Status of Professional Ethics for Judges in Modern Professionalism Discourse

Document Type : Research/Original/Regular Article

Authors
1 Faculty member of the Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University
2 Law Department, Tehran Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University. Tehran. Iran (Head of the Judiciary Research Institute)
10.22106/jlj.2026.2069031.6479
Abstract
Professional ethics plays a highly effective role in enhancing judges’ performance and conduct. This ethics has received less attention due to the organization of adjudication within the public administration and the predominance of the administrative dimension over the professional aspect of adjudication. Accordingly, how can judges’ professional ethics be reconstructed and put into practice in our country? In this article, by employing an analytical–critical method and drawing upon library and documentary sources, it is argued that professional ethics is based on two approaches: traditional professionalism and new professionalism. The discourse of new professionalism emerged at the beginning of the twentieth century, and various interpretations of it have developed, including “professionalism and professionalization,” “organizational professionalism,” and “professional practice.” After examining these interpretations, the model of “professional competence” has been introduced as a framework for reconstructing judges’ professionalism and enhancing their professional practice and professional ethics. Furthermore, the strategies for institutionalizing this model have been explained under four dimensions, namely the “establishment of a professional association,” the “implementation of a merit-based process,” “ethical education,” and “ethical commitment and accountability,” and the relevant regulations within the country have been examined. Finally, the necessary recommendations for the realization of the aforementioned model have been presented through legal, administrative, and educational reforms
Keywords
Subjects

فهرست منابع
الف. فارسی
* باقری، خسرو (1377)، «تربیت حرفه­ای در بستر دیدگاه اسلام»، روش­شناسی علوم انسانی، شماره 15 و 14.
* جوادی آملی، عبدالله (1390)، ادب قضا در اسلام، چاپ دوم، قم: اسراء.
* جعفری‌تبار، حسن (1388)، فلسفه تفسیری حقوق، تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار.
* دورکیم، امیل (1391)، درس­های جامعه­شناسی؛ فیزیک اخلاقیات و حقوق، برگردان: سید جمال­الدین موسوی، تهران: نی.
* رستمی، ولی و بابایی، حسین (1397)، «استقلال استخدامی قوه قضاییه جمهوری اسلامی ایران»، فصل‌نامه مطالعات حقوق عمومی، دوره 49، شماره 2.
* شجاعی، منوچهر (1381)، «تأملی بر مبانی نظری نظام­های اداری مدرن»، دانش مدیریت، مجله دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه تهران، سال پانزدهم، شماره 56.
* شهریاری، حمید (1383)، «فلسفه‌ی‌ اخلاق‌ و سیاست‌ ارسطو و افلاطون‌ از نگاه‌ السدیر مک‌اینتایر»، کتاب نقد، شماره 30.
* فون هایک، فریدریش (1380)، قانون، قانون­گذاری و آزادی، برگردان: مهشید معیری و موسی غنی­نژاد، تهران: طرح نو.
* قراملکی، احد فرامرز؛ درخشانی، لعبت و رضایی شریف آبادی، سعید (1391)، اخلاق حرفه­ای در کتابداری و اطلاع­رسانی، چاپ چهارم، تهران: سمت.
* قراملکی، احد فرامرز و نوچه فلاح، رستم (1386)، موانع رشد اخلاق حرفه­ای در سازمان­ها، تهران: بشرا.
* لگنهاوزن، محمد (1384)، «معرفت­شناسی خرد»، برگردان: حسن مهرنیا، اندیشه­های فلسفی، سال نخست، شماره 2.
* مرادی، امیر (1397)، اخلاق حرفه­ای در گستره کنش‌گران حقوق کیفری، تهران: میزان.
* مک­اینتایر، السدیر (1393)، در پی فضیلت (تحقیقی در نظریه اخلاقی)، برگردان: حمید شهریاری و محمدعلی شمالی، تهران: سمت.
* مکولی، جان و دبرلی، ژوآنی و جانسون، فیل (1389)، نظریه سازمان­ها؛ نگاه­ها و چالش­ها، برگردان: حسن دانایی­فرد و سید حسین کاظمی، تهران: دانشگاه امام صادق (ع).
* یوسفی، یحیی (1397)، اخلاق حرفه­ای در نظام قضایی ایران، تهران: پژوهشگاه قوه قضاییه.
* یوسفی، یحیی (1396)،گزارش کمیسیون تأمل در اخلاق قضایی در فرانسه، برگردان:  ناصر سلطانی، تهران: پژوهشگاه قوه قضاییه، تحقیقات قضایی.
 ب. انگلیسی
 
* Adams, Guy B.(2000).Administrative Ethics and the Chimera of Professionalism The Historical Context of Public Service Ethics” In-Cooper, Terry L., Handbook of Administrative ethics, second edition, United States, New York, Marcel Dekker inc,pp,291-309.
* Airaksinen, Timo (N.d),”The Philosophy of Professional Ethics”, Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) and Institutional Issues Involving Ethics and Justice, Volume 1. pp.201-216.
* Bakon, Francis (1908), The Essays, Edited with introduction and notes by Mary Augusta Scott, New York, Charles Scribner’s son.
* Billett, Stephen, Harteis, Christian, Gruber Hans(eds) (2014), International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning, Springer International Handbooks of Education.
* Evans, Linda (2008), “Professionalism, professionality and the development of education professionals”, British Journal of Educational Studies, 56 (1). pp. 20-38.
* Evett, Julia(2014),” The Concept of Professionalism: Professional Work, Professional Practice and Learning”, in S. Billett et al. (eds.), International Handbook of Research in Professional 29 and Practice-based Learning, Springer International Handbooks of Education.
* Evetts, Julia (2003), “The Sociological Analysis of Professionalism: Occupational Change in the Modern World”. International Sociology, Vol 18(2), SAGE (London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi): 395-415.
* Fournier, Valérie (1999), “The appeal to professionalism as a disciplinary mechanism”. Social Review, 47 (2), 280–307.
* Fox, Charles J. (1992), “What do we mean when we say professionalism? A language usage analysis for public administration”, The American Review of Public Administration, 22(1),pp 1-17.
* Frankel, Mark S (1989), “Professional codes: Why, how, and with what impact?”, Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 109-115.
* Freidson, Eliot (1994), Professionalism Reborn: Theory, Prophecy and Policy, UK Cambridge, Polity Press, in association with Blackwell Publishers.
* Gaylin, Willard and Jennings, Bruce(1996), The Perversion of Autonomy, New York, The Free Press, pp. 127-149.
* Holroyd, Colin (2000),Are assessors professional? Active Learning in Higher Education”, Active Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 28-44.
* Hoyle, E (1975), “Professionality, professionalism and control in teaching”. In V. Houghton et al. (eds) Management in Education: the Management of Organisations and Individuals, London, Ward Lock Educational in association with Open University Press.
* Johnson, Terence J. (1972), Professions and Power, UK, London, Macmillan.
* Ladd,  John (1992), “The Quest for a Code of Professional Ethics: An Intellectual and Moral Confusion”, in - Deborah Rhode and David Luhan, Legal Ethics, St. Paul: Foundation Press, pp. 121-127.
* Larkin, Gerald (1983), Occupational Monopoly and Modern Medicine, UK, London, Tavistock.
* Lewis, Carol Weiss, Gilman, Stuart, C (2012), The Ethics Challenge in Public Service: A -Problem-Solving Guide, 3rd Edition, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
* Maine, Henry Sumner. (1908), Ancient Law , London, John Murray Albemarle.
* Menzel, Donald, C (1997), “Teaching ethics and values”, Political Science& Politics, 30(3), pp 518-524.
*Parsons, talcott (1939), “The professions and social structure”, Social Forces: an International Journal of Social Research, vol. 17, nr. 4, (pp. 457-467)
* Poole, Ross (1991), Morality and Modernity, UK, london, Routledge
* Saks, Mike (2003), The neo-Weberian approach to the sociology of the professions.  In G. Verpraet, C. Gadea, P. Milburn, M. Vervaeke and F. Charles (Eds.) Les Professions Face aux.
* Saks, Mike (2010), “analyzing the professions: the Case for the Neo-Weberian Approach”, Comparative Sociology, v 9, (pp 887-915), Netherland, leiden.
* Smith, Adam(2006), The Theory of Moral Sentiments, sixth Edition,1790, Brasil, sao paulo, metalibri.
* Tocqueville, Alexis de.(2009), Democracy in America: Historical-Critical Edition of De la de´mocratie en Ame´rique/Alexis de Tocqueville; edited by Eduardo Nolla; translated from the French by James T. Schleifer, Indiana, Indianapolis, liberty fund, inc.
* Hughes, Everett C.(1958), Men and their Work, United States, New York, Free Press.
* Larson, Magalli Sarfatti (1977), the Rise of Professionalism, United States, Berkeley, University of California Press.
* Plant, Jeremy F.(2000),” Codes of Ethics In-Cooper, Terry L, Handbook of Administrative ethics, second edition, United States, New York, Marcel Dekker inc,pp, 309-335.
Volume 89, Issue 132
Winter 2026
Pages 5-36

  • Receive Date 30 January 2026
  • Accept Date 10 June 2026
  • First Publish Date 10 June 2026
  • Publish Date 22 December 2025