Using the article 234 of the civil code which states, "... condition of corollary is conditioning something to take place outside..." and considering the other rules indicate that the condition of corollary must be formulated in the form of composition. Therefore, legal scholars believe that, in principle, the formulation or revocation of marriage contract which is special cannot be the subject of condition of corollary. Meanwhile, this exploration among legal scholars does not have a regulation and juridical investigations indicate that supreme jurists believe that formulation and revocation of marriage contract cannot be belonging to the condition of corollary. However, it seems that most of the previous literature is not firm enough. Therefore, this study, using descriptive-analytical method, assesses the feasibility of formulation and revocation of marriage contract in the form of mentioned condition considering the various kinds of mentioned contract, different predicted series of ways to breach it, and referring to suspension mechanism, with separating the notions of condition of voidable result and composition of mentioned legal enforcement which is definitive. By providing modern analyses, it also infers the feasibility of formulation and revocation of marriage contract with the mentioned condition.