فارسی

• اسکینی، ربیعا (1392)، حقوق تجارت؛ شرکت‌های تجاری، جلد دوم، ویراست دوم، تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی (سمت).
• پاسبان، محمدرضا (1394)، حقوق شرکت‌های تجاری، ویراست دوم، تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی (سمت).
• پاسبان، محمدرضا و مجتبی جهانیان (1392)، «دعوای مشتق و آیین آن: بررسی تطبیقی در حقوق ایران و انگلستان»، پژوهش حقوق خصوصی، شمارۀ 4.
• دمرچیلی، محمد، علی حاتمی و محسن قرائی (1392)، قانون تجارت در نظم کنونی حقوقی، چاپ بیستم، تهران: انتشارات دادستان.
• عیسائی تفرشی، محمد، سعیده امیرتیموری، مرتضی نصیری و مرتضی شهبازی‌نیا (1393)، «مفهوم دعوای مشتق و ویژگی استثنایی آن (مطالعه تطبیقی در حقوق انگلستان، آمریکا، فرانسه و ایران)»، مجله پژوهش‌های حقوق تطبیقی، دورۀ 18، شمارۀ 4.
• فرحناکیان، فرشید (1398)، قانون تجارت در نظم کنونی حقوقی، چاپ یازدهم، تهران: انتشارات میزان.
• کاتوزیان، ناصر (1395)، الزام‌های خارج از قرارداد، مسئولیت مدنی، قواعد عمومی، جلد اول، چاپ چهاردهم، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
• شمس، عبدالله (1393)، آیین دادرسی مدنی، دوره پیشرفته، جلد نخست، چاپ سی‌و‌یکم، تهران: دراک.

آرای قضایی

• دادنامۀ شمارۀ 9209970900800621 مورخ 08/04/1392 شعبۀ 8 دیوان عدالت اداری.
• دادنامۀ شمارۀ 9209970902200999 مورخ 12/05/1392 شعبۀ 22 دیوان عدالت اداری.
• دادنامۀ شمارۀ 9209970905600437 مورخ 13/12/1392 شعبۀ 1 تجدیدنظر دیوان عدالت اداری.
• دادنامۀ شمارۀ 9209970222700525 مورخ 19/04/1392 شعبۀ 27 دادگاه تجدیدنظر استان تهران.
• دادنامۀ شمارۀ 9109970222801226 مورخ 30/10/1391 شعبۀ 28 دادگاه تجدیدنظر استان تهران.
• دادنامۀ شمارۀ 9209970220700106 مورخ 21/02/1392 شعبۀ 7 دادگاه تجدیدنظر استان تهران.
• دادنامۀ شمارۀ 9109970223701517 مورخ 26/12/1391 شعبۀ 37 دادگاه تجدیدنظر استان تهران.

انگلیسی / فرانسوی

Books

• Bourne, Nicholas, Principles of Company Law, 3^rd edition, Cavendish Publishing Ltd., 1998.
• Chen, Wenjing, A Comparative Study of Funding Shareholder Litigation, Springer, 1^st edition, 2017.
• Davies, Paul, Worthington, Sarah, Gower Principles of Modern Company Law, 10^th edition, Sweet & Maxwell, 2016.
• Dignam, Alan; Lowry, John; Company Law, 7^th edition, Oxford University Press, 2012.
• Goo, S H, Minority Shareholders’ Protection; A Study of Section 459 of the Companies Act 1985, 1^st edition, Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 1994.
• Hannigan, Brenda, Company Law, 3^rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2012.
• Dine, Janet, Company Law, 2^nd edition, Cavendish Publishing Ltd. 1999.
• Joffe, Victor et al., Minority Shareholders: Law, Practice and Procedures, 3^rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2008.
• McLaughlin, Susan, Unlocking Company Law, 2^nd edition, Routledge, 2013.
• Merle, Philippe, Droit Commercial: Sociétés Commerciales, 7^th edition, Dalloz, 2000.
• Reisberg, Arad, Derivative Actions and Corporate Governance: Theory and Operation, 1^st edition, Oxford University Press, 2009.
• Sealy, Len, Worthington, Sarah, Sealy's Cases and Materials in Company Law, 9^th edition, Oxford University Press, 2010.
• Wrbka, Stefan, Van Uytsel, Steven, Siems, Mathias (eds.), Collective Actions – Enhancing Access to Justice and Reconciling Multilayer Interests?, 1^st edition, Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Articles

• Anderson, Helen; Welsh, Michelle; Ramsay, Ian; Gahan, Peter; “The Evolution of Shareholder and Creditor Protection in Australia: An International Comparison”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 61, Issue 1, 2012.
• Braendle, Udo, “Shareholder Protection in the USA and Germany; Law and Finance Revisited”, German Law Journal, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2006.
• Buckle, Paul, “The Rule Against Reflective Loss, Trusts and Freeman v Ansbacher in Jersey”, Trusts &Trustees, Vol. 16, No. 9, 2010.
• Chaisse, Julien, “Shareholder Protection Reloaded – The Matrix of Shareholder Claims for Reflective Loss”, Stanford Journal of International Law, Vol. 52 Issue 1, 2016.
• Clarke, Malcolm, “Litigation by Shareholders and Reflective Loss”, The Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 60, Part 2, 2001.
• Conway, Gerard, “Ne Bis in Idem in International Law”, International Criminal Law Review, 2003.
• De Jong, Bas J. “Shareholders’ Claims for Reflective Loss: A Comparative Legal Analysis”, European Business Organization Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2013.
• DeMott, Deborah A., “Shareholder Litigation in Australia and the United States: Common Problems, Uncommon Solutions”, Sydney Law Review, Vol. 11, 1986.
• Fleischer, Holger, “Comparative Corporate Governance in Closely Held Corporations”, in Gordon, Jeffrey N., Ringe, Wolf-Georg (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance, 1^st edition, Oxford University Press, 2018.
• Gelter, Martin, “Mapping Types of Shareholder Lawsuits across Jurisdiction”, ECGI Working Paper Series in Law, Fordham University School of Law, Working Paper No. 363/2017, in Erickson, Jessica; Griffith, Sean; Webber, David; Winship, Verity (eds.), Research Handbook on Representative Shareholder Litigation, Edward Elgard Publishing, 1^st edition, 2018.
• Gelter, Martin, “Why do Shareholder Derivative Suits Remain Rare in Continental Europe?”, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Vol. 37, Issue 3, 2012.
• Goo, S H, “Multiple Derivative Action and Common Law Derivative Action Revisited: A Tale of Two Jurisdictions”, Journal of Corporate Law Studies, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2010.
• Ireland, Paddy, Grigg-Spall, Ian, Kelly, Dave, “The Conceptual Foundations of Modern Company Law”, Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1987.
• Hill, Jennifer, “Visions and Revisions of the Shareholder”, American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 48, 2000.
• Koh, Pearlie, “The Shareholder’s Personal Claim: Allowing Recovery for Reflective Loss”, Singapore Academy of Law Journal, Vol. 23, 2011.
• Likillimba, Guy-Auguste, “Le Préjudice Individuel et/ou Collectif en Droit des Groupements”, Revue trimestrielle de droit commercial et de droit économique, Dalloz, 2009.
• Lowe, Tom, “Mixed and Multiple Derivative Claims to Address Reflective Loss Problems”, Trusts &Trustees, Vol. 20, No. 9, 2014.
• McLeannan, JS, “Companies, Shareholders and Reflective Losses”, Mercantile Law Journal, Vol. 17, Issue 2, 2005.
• Shapira, Gioba, “Shareholder Personal Action in Respect of a Loss Suffered by the Company: The Problem of Overlapping Claims and Reflective Loss in English Company Law”, The International Lawyer, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2003.
• Siems, Mathias, “Private Enforcement of Directors’ Duties; Derivative Actions as a Global Phenomenon”, in Wrbka, Stefan, Van Uytsel, Steven, Siems, Mathias (eds),
• Spotorno, Agustin, “Why is the Rule in Foss v. Harbottle Such an Important One?”, Business Law Review, Vol. 39, No. 6, 2018.
• Steinfeld, Alan, “In the Looking Glass: Holding Companies and Reflective Loss”, Trusts &Trustees, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2016.
• Xiaoning Li, A Comparative Study of Shareholders’ Derivative Actions: England, The United States, Germany and China, Kluwer, 2007.

Judgements and Awards

England

• Alfred McAlpine Construction Ltd v Panatown Ltd [2001] 1 AC
• Bond v Barrow Haematite Steel Co (1902) 1 Ch 353
• Burland v Earle (1902) AC 83
• Day v Cook (2001) EWCA Civ 592
• Foss v Harbottle (1843) 2 Hare 461
• Gaetano Ltd v Obertor Ltd (2009) EWHC 2653 (Ch)
• Gardner v Parker (2004) EWCA Civ 781
• George Fischer (Great Britain) Ltd v Multi Construction Ltd (1995) 1 BCLC 260
• Giles v Rhind (2002) EWCA Civ 1428
• Johnson v Gore Wood (2002) 2 AC 1 per Lord Bingham
• Lee v Sheard (1956) 1956 QB 1 192 – 1956
• Liverpool No 2 [1963];
• Macaura v Northern Assurance co Ltd. (1925) AC 619
• MacDougall v Gardiner (1875) 1 Ch. D. 13 - Supreme Court (1875)
• Mozley v Alston, (1847) 1Ph
• Prudential Assurance v Newman (1982) 1 Ch 204
• Rushmer v Mervyn Smith (2009) EWHC 94 (QB)
• Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd (2020)
• Shaker v Al-Bedrawi (2002) EWCA Civ 1452
• Webster v Sandersons (2009) EWCA Civ 830
• Wood v Odessa Waterworks Co (1889) Lr 42 Ch d 636

United States

• Carter v Berger (1985) 777 F.2d 1173
• Cashman v Coopers (1993) 623 N.E.2d 907 251 Ill. App.3d 730 191 Ill. Dec. 317
• Erlich v Glasner (1969) 418 F.2d 226, 227-28 (9th Cir.)
• Gaubert v United States (1989) 855 F.2d 1284 (5th Cir.).
• Mann v Kemper Fin. Cos. (1993) 247 Ill.App.3d 966, 973, 187 Ill. Dec. 726, 618 N.E.2d 317, 322
• O'Bannon v Town Court Nursing Center (1980) 447 U.S. 773, 100 S.Ct. 2467, 65 L.Ed.2d 506
• Quarles v City of East Cleveland, (1999) US App. LEXIS 34061 (6th Cir.)
• Rand v Anaconda-Ericsson Inc. (1986) 794 F.2d 843
• Small v Goldman (1986) 637 F.Supp. 1030, 1031 (D.N.J.)
• Stevens v Lowder (1981) 643 F.2d 1078
• Tooley v Donaldson (2004) Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc., 845 A.2d 1031 (Sup. Ct. Del.)
• Twohy v First National Bank of Chicago (1985) 758 F.2d 1185, 1194 (7^th)
• Varga v McGraw Hill Fin. Inc. (2015) NY Slip Op 31453 (U)
• Warren v Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit (1985) 759 F.2d 542
• Zokoych v Spalding (1976) 36 Ill.App.3d 654, 663, 344 N.E.2d 805

France

• Cour de cassation, affaire No. 97-10886 (2002)
• Cour de cassation, affair No. 99-80387 (2000)
• Cour de cassation, affaire No. 97-80664 (2000)
• Cour de cassation, affaire No. 97-84885 (2000)
• Cour d'appel de Versailles, affaire No. 04-1262 (2005)

Germany

• BGH 20.03.1995, BGHZ 129, 136, 166

Netherlands

• Ventaz Engineering v Industriebond FNV, HR Dec. 12, 1997, NJ 1998/348
• Tuin Beheer v Houthoff Buruma, HR Feb. 16, 2007, JOR 2007/112
• Van den Mosselaar v Lagero, HR Jul. 14, 2000, NJ 2001/685
• Chipshol v Coopers & Lybrand, HR Jun. 15, 2001, JOR 2001/172
• Kessock v S.F.T. Bank N.V., HR Nov. 2, 2007, NJ 2008/5.
• Poot v ABP, HR Dec. 2, 1994, NJ 1995/288

Reports and Guidelines

• Study on Minority Shareholders Protection – Final Report, European Commission, Publication Office of the European Union, 2018. Available at:

https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/1893f7b8-93a4-11e8-8bc1-01aa75ed71a1/language-en, last visited on May 29, 2020.

• Principles of Corporate Governance: Analysis and Recommendations, Eisenberg, Melvin A. (chief reporter), American Law Institute, 2012.
• G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2015.

Miscellaneous

• http://www.dutchcivillaw.com/content/legalsystem011.htm, last visited on December 5, 2020.
• Bigge, David M., “Judicial Economy in Investor-State Disputes”, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 2017.